ON TARGET: Canada Must denounce the Glorification of Nazis

By Scott Taylor

On January 1, 2022 hundreds of jubilant revellers gathered in Kiev, Lviv and numerous other Ukrainian cities and towns. They were not celebrating the arrival of the New Year but rather they were commemorating the birthdate of Ukrainian ultra-nationalist Stepan Bandera.

To those unfamiliar with World War II history, such celebrations may seem innocuous enough on the surface. These were patriotic Ukrainians honouring a man who spent his life dedicated to the creation of an independent Ukraine.

It would seem natural enough that in the face of current Russian posturing along the Ukraine border and clandestine support for the pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine that young Ukrainians would herald the efforts of men like Bandera who once fought for Ukraine’s independence.
Unfortunately history reveals a far more sinister legacy of Bandera.

In order to achieve his objective of an independent Ukraine, Bandera made a deal with the devil – namely Adolf Hitler.

When Nazi Germany invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941, Bandera and his ultranationalist supporters were openly allied with Hitler’s legions. They were also willing participants in the early phases of the Holocaust which involved the mass liquidation of Ukrainian Jews and Poles.

This murderous entry in Bandera’s biography was not forgotten by the Israeli embassy tweeting in response to the January 1 Bandera celebrations that, “The glorification of those who supported Nazi ideology tarnishes the memory of Holocaust victims in Ukraine.”

To their discredit, the Canadian Embassy in Ukraine remained silent rather than issue a similar denunciation regarding the glorification of a man who once participated in the wholesale extermination of human beings in the name of Hitler’s ‘Final Solution.’

Canada actually has significant leverage over the current Ukrainian regime as we have been perhaps the staunchest NATO member pushing for the alliance to stand in solidarity with Ukraine against possible Russian aggression.

Since 2014, Canada has deployed 200 military trainers and a wealth of non-lethal military hardware to bolster the Ukrainian Army.

With an estimated 70,000 Russian troops massed along Ukraine’s eastern border, one would think that the Kiev regime would be doing all they can to appease those western nations that are pledging them military support.

Canada risked nothing diplomatically had we condemned the Bandera glorification.
We can proudly state that our WW2 veteran’s fought against Nazi Germany and that the allied victory ended the Holocaust – one of the most evil chapters in human history.
We need also remind ourselves that Bandera’s Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) also slaughtered tens of thousands of Poles.

Given that it is Ukraine’s potential admission into NATO which is at the crux of the current crisis with Russia, and that Poland is already a member of NATO, allowing the public glorification of Bandera further illustrates a lack of sensitivity on the part of the Ukrainian government.
As a good friend, in good standing with Ukraine, Canada has an obligation to provide the Kiev regime with some plain talk and bad manners. Our Ambassador should have soundly denounced the glorification of Bandera.

The failure of the Canadian government to do so drew a backlash from B’nai Brith Canada’s President Michael Mostyn. “We cannot allow political leaders to be pushing these politically charged agendas and distorting units that collaborated with the Nazis and individuals who collaborated with the Nazis” Mostyn recently told the Hill Times. “It is time now to take a more aggressive approach when it comes to Holocaust distortion.”
In 2020 the Canadian government created the post of a special envoy to protect Holocaust Remembrance. In announcing this post, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau committed to confront the rise of anti-Semitism in Canada and abroad.

Despite those strong words, little to no actual actions have been undertaken.
Canada maintains a 600 strong battle group in Latvia to deter any potential Russian aggression against this former Soviet Baltic state.

Despite the presence of our soldiers, the Latvian authorities allow an annual parade in the streets of Riga to commemorate the WW2 SS Latvian Legion. Latvia is the only country in Europe that still stages a public glorification of SS soldiers who had pledged their alliance to Adolf Hitler.

In 2019, for the first time, Canada officially denounced these parades but one has to believe that as a good friend to Latvia we could exert more pressure on the Riga regime to stop this public glorification of Nazis.
Maybe in 2022, we could start by cleaning house domestically. By this I mean we could start removing those statues which glorify Nazi collaborators such as the Roman Shukhevych monument in Edmonton.
Perhaps we could instead erect a tribute to the approximately 40,000 brave Ukrainian-Canadians who fought in Canadian uniforms to defeat Hitler.

Just a thought.

ON TARGET: Putin is Not The Strongman He Would Have us Believe

By Scott Taylor

As the sabre-rattling between NATO and Russia intensifies over the sovereignty of Ukraine, so too has the hypocrisy increased on the part of those cheerleading for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

These tub-thumpers feign moral outrage that Russian President Vladimir Putin would even attempt to exert influence over his neighbouring states.

For Russia the stakes are high. Putin views this potential admittance of Ukraine into the NATO alliance as a reckless provocation. Since 2014 the eastern provinces of Ukraine have been under the control of pro-Russian, Ukrainian rebels.

The enclaves of Donetsk and Luhansk have remained an often not-so-frozen conflict between Ukrainian government forces – many of whom are trained by Canadian military personnel – and the Russian-backed Ukrainian rebels.

Should Ukraine opt to accept the invitation from the NATO alliance that was first extended to them in 2008, and never revoked, this would commit all 30 NATO member states to the collective defence of Ukraine.

Given that Ukraine authorities describe the eastern breakaway territories as “Russian occupied,” and that they do not accept Putin’s 2014 formal annexation of the Crimea, it means that upon admission to NATO, the alliance would essentially be at war with Russia.

One can understand how that might be a little intimidating for Putin.

Those few conflict analysts who dare challenge the pro-west narrative often point out that the U.S. responded with similar indignation back in 1962.

At that juncture the Soviet Union had signed a deal with Cuban President Fidel Castro to forward deploy nuclear missiles in Cuba. The rationale for this was two-fold.

For the Soviet Union it was seen as a strategic counter to the U.S. having recently deployed nuclear missiles in both Turkey and Italy.

For Castro and the Cubans it was hoped that these Soviet missiles would deter the U.S. from attempting to repeat their 1961 failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba.

Having Soviet nuclear warheads based just 120km off the coast of Florida was a red line for the U.S.A.

President John F. Kennedy over-ruled his Pentagon advisors who advocated a pre-emptive strike on the Cuban based Soviet missiles.

Instead, Kennedy ordered a full scale naval ‘quarantine’ of Cuba to prevent any further Soviet military support being delivered. Kennedy was careful to avoid using the word ‘blockade,’ as that would have been an act of war.

After taking the world to the mutual destruction nuclear precipice, both the Soviets and the Americans blinked and backed down. The Cuban missile crisis ended with the Soviets withdrawing their missiles from Cuba, and the U.S. removed their warheads from Turkey.

In October 1983, in response to internal political strife and the increased influence of Cuban and Soviet communists, the U.S. led a coalition to invade the Caribbean Island of Grenada. This attack was denounced by the United Nations General Assembly as a “flagrant violation of International Law.”

This  denouncement by the U.N mattered not a whit to U.S. President Ronald Reagan who was prepared to dismiss the ‘rules-based international order’ moniker in order to demonstrate that America polices its own back yard.

This approach was repeated in December 1989 by President George H.W. Bush when he ordered the U.S. invasion of Panama.

The primary objective of the attack was to depose Panamanian ruler Manuel Noriega and replace him with a more pro-American puppet.

Militarily this conflict was about as one-sided as you could get with the U.S. already having troops and bases in the country as part of their Canal Zone defence force. It was not a case of David versus Goliath, it was more like Mickey Mouse versus Goliath on steroids.

This time around both the U.S General Assembly and the Organization of American States (OAS) condemned the U.S. invasion of a sovereign state as a ‘violation of international law.’

Again, the U.S. leadership could not give a rat’s behind what the world thought about their invasion.

In an iconic twist that proved the Pentagon planners have a self-awareness and a sense of humour, the invasion of Panama and the subsequent arrest of Noriega was code-named “Operation Just Cause.”

Putin might wish to mimic his U.S. counterparts with an equally cavalier disregard for international law, justified by the nearness of the threat to Russia itself. However, Russia of 2022 is not the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War.

Putin can make threats of unleashing nuclear Armageddon should he feel further threatened. However he does not have the military means to defy NATO, even in his own neighbourhood.

In that, Putin can only envy the U.S.A.

ON TARGET: KICKING SEXUAL MISCONDUCT “TO THE MOON”

By Scott Taylor

We have now passed the threshold into 2022 and the New Year is always a good time to reflect on the events that transpired over the previous 12 months.

For the Canadian Armed Forces those reflections reveal some depressingly similar circumstances to those which face our military and political leadership moving forward into 2022.

At the end of 2020 major military procurement projects such as the replacement of the CF-18 fighter jets and the building of the RCN’s future fleet were facing problematic delays, indecisions and cost escalations. Ditto 2021.

COVID-19 restrictions posed a serious challenge for units to train, parade and operate effectively. Ditto 2021.

In terms of deployments, Canada had a 650 member battlegroup stationed as a deterrent to Russian aggression in Latvia, and a Parliament-authorized contingent in Iraq and the Middle East with a strength of up to 850 personnel. Ditto 2021.

One of the major headaches plaguing the senior military leadership was that of dealing with sexual misconduct in late 2020.

On Oct. 28 of that year, Gen. Jonathan Vance had announced a plan called The Path Towards Dignity and Respect. This was to be a long term plan to refocus the 2015 Operation Honour – the CAF’s campaign against sexual misconduct in the ranks – on changing the underlying culture of misconduct and setting up the program to be a permanent fixture of DND.

Now readers need to remember that Op Honour was implemented after a damaging series of media reports in 2013/2014 revealed widespread sexual misconduct throughout the CAF.

This led to an independent review by former Supreme Court Justice Marie Deschamps which confirmed everyone’s worst fears and detailed what she called a military steeped in a highly masculine, sexualized culture where leaders turn a blind eye to misconduct.

Unfortunately for all involved, the Path Towards Dignity and Respect turned out to be laden with landmines that devastated the military senior command tasked with navigating it.

The first to fall was outgoing Chief of Defence Staff, Gen. Vance, when Global News reported on February 2, 2021 that he had allegedly committed two acts of sexual misconduct.

After a months long military police investigation, Vance has been charged with a single count of obstruction and is scheduled to appear in court in March 2023.

The Vance story set in motion a flurry of allegations against top Admirals and Generals including Vance’s successor as CDS, Admiral Art McDonald.

At time of writing, no fewer than nine senior General Officers or Flag officers were suspended or ‘retired’ from their posts pending investigations or court cases.

On the surface it would seem that the Canadian military is closing out 2021 just as embattled on the sexual misconduct front as they were in 2020.

However, as an eternal optimist, I have to believe that as we move forward into the new year, the changes put in place in recent months will allow our military to actually make real headway in effecting cultural change.

Up until now it has seemed like that running Peanuts comic gag where Lucy promises to hold the football while Charlie Brown kicks it. Invariably Charlie Brown mistakenly puts his faith in Lucy, promises he is going to kick that ball “to the moon” and every time Lucy reverts to character, swipes the ball away and Charlie Brown ends up flat on his back. 

Long time observers of the Canadian military will recall that the first major sexual misconduct revelations came to light in 1998 when Macleans magazine ran an unprecedented four consecutive cover stories on the topic. Public outrage sparked the creation of the office of the Canadian Forces Ombudsman.

However that post was proven to be incapable of changing the culture when Macleans revisited the subject in their 2013 reports.

Then it was the Deschamps’ report, followed by Op Honour, refocused as Paths towards Dignity and Respect and then, as a result of the current crisis, yet another independent review by former Supreme Court Justice Louise Arbour.

That is a lot of announced solutions without success to make one sceptical that this time around things will be different.

However, there has also been a major changing of the guard at virtually every top job in the military environment.

We now have a female Minister of National Defence, Deputy Minister, Vice Chief of Defence Staff and Lt-Gen Jennie Carignan assigned to a new position designed to focus on reforming the military culture.

In recent media interviews, Carignan has predicted it will take up to five years to obtain the desired results.

Given the team in place, I think this time there will indeed be contact with that ‘football’.

They might not kick it “to the moon” but they will boot it downfield. I hope.

ON TARGET: Putin is more of a Cornered Rat than a Bullish Aggressor

By Scott Taylor

Last Thursday there was a meeting in Brussels between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and senior officials at NATO Headquarters.

Zelensky was there to plead Ukraine’s case for NATO’s military support in advance of any Russian incursion into eastern Ukraine.

In recent weeks Ukrainian, U.S. and NATO intelligence sources have reported a large Russian military build up along the Ukrainian border.

The estimated timeframe for this feared invasion is within the next few weeks or perhaps a few months.

Instead of simply pledging the requested support to Zelensky, NATO Secretary General Jen Stoltenberg cunningly stated instead that NATO’s 2008 invitation for Ukraine to join the alliance remains open.

Having Ukraine join NATO, rather than remain a neutral sovereign state is a publically declared ‘red line’ for Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Thus Stoltenberg is using the alleged immediate threat of a Russian invasion to secure Ukraine’s permanent membership in the alliance – which in turn could push Putin over the edge into taking military measures.

It is being played out like some sort of geo-political chess game, but saner heads need to remember that at the end of the day we are talking about nuclear-armed opponents, not chess players.

The NATO spin-doctors paint Russia as the aggressor in all of this and point to Putin’s 2014 annexation of the Crimea as proof positive that the muscle bound dictator is bent on world domination.

The standard depiction of Putin is that this former KGB agent longs for the good old days when the Soviet Union had the western world trembling in fear.

During my military service in the 1980’s I served with 4 Canadian Mechanized Brigade Group in West Germany. To this day I’m proud to wear my NATO medal.

However the Cold War is long over and the 30-member NATO of today is not the 16-member alliance that formed a collective defence against the expansion of communism.

Canada was a founding member when the North Atlantic Treaty was signed in 1949. When West Germany joined NATO in 1955, the Soviet reaction was to create their own collective defence alliance known as the Warsaw Pact.

At the height of the Cold War there were seven member states in the Warsaw Pact in addition to the Soviet Union.

In 1989 the dissolution of communist Europe began and by 1991 even the Soviet Union had broken up into 15 separate republics.

Since that historic juncture, NATO has added 14 new members which include all the former Warsaw Pact countries along with the three former Soviet Baltic republics; Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia.

At their summit meeting in 1990, U.S. President Ronald Regan promised Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev that there would be no eastward expansion of the NATO alliance. Yet in the subsequent three decades NATO has grown in numbers and capability and now borders Russia itself, in Poland and the Baltic.

Putin flexed his might in annexing the Crimea in 2014, but in the grander scheme of things he is strategically more of a cornered rat than a formidable aggressor.

The official Russian response to Ukraine’s possible admission into NATO was to threaten the deployment of medium range nuclear missiles.

While the NATO spin machine would have us believe that this is Putin threatening Western Europe, it seems more like a desperate defensive threat.

The senior Russian military leadership are not so delusional as to think they could defeat the massive NATO alliance in a conventional conflict.

So they issue a reminder that they still possess the means to deliver on the old Cold War premise of nuclear ‘Mutual Assured Destruction’ (MAD).

Prior to the meeting between Stoltenberg and Zelensky, U.S. President Joe Biden had a chat with Putin to warn Russia that any military incursion into Ukraine would be met with severe economic sanctions.

One of the targets of such measures would be the recently completed, but not yet functioning, Nord Stream 2 oil and gas pipelines.

These pipelines run across the Baltic Sea and directly connect Russian oil and gas exports to Western Europe. By doubling the capacity with the second pipeline, the U.S. fears that this only further increase the Kremlin’s leverage over industrialized Western Europe.

It also further diminishes Russia’s need to rely upon the existing over land pipelines to Europe, which run through Ukraine.

It is a complex chess game indeed, and we should not be playing chicken with a nuclear-armed opponent under the dumbed down pretext that Putin simply wants to rule the world.

ON TARGET: Afghanistan Inquiry Should Examine How Canada got Into the War, Not How We Ended it

By Scott Taylor

Last week the House of Commons passed a Conservative motion to establish a committee to investigate Canada’s handling of what has been dubbed the ‘Afghanistan Crisis.’

While the Trudeau minority government opposed the creation of this committee, the motion was supported by the Bloc Quebecois and the NDP.

Unfortunately the scope of this investigation is limited to the events surrounding the Taliban takeover last August, and how Canada failed to prepare for that eventuality.

One focus of the parliamentary probe will be Canada’s failure to have a plan in place to evacuate those Afghans who had assisted Canadian troops during their decade long participation in that conflict.

One of the most strident and vocal critics of Canada’s handling of the ‘Afghanistan Crisis’ is none other than Maj-Gen (ret’d) David Fraser.

This former combat commander welcomes the establishment of the committee, but Fraser remains frustrated at the slow pace at which Canada is fulfilling its promise to bring 40,000 Afghans to Canada.

What makes Fraser’s current public stance so ironic is that he was one of the most fervent cheerleaders of Canada’s Afghan mission and the claim that all was going smoothly during that operation.

In 2018, Fraser released his book which was misleadingly entitled ‘Operation Medusa: The Furious Battle that saved Afghanistan from the Taliban.’

One can forgive the Trudeau government for not making emergency plans for a mass evacuation of Afghans when our own Canadian combat general proclaimed the Taliban was defeated in a battle back in 2006.

At the height of Canada’s commitment to the war in Afghanistan, Canada did indeed contribute a disproportionate share of the ISAF alliance’s troops and resources. However it must be remembered that we withdrew from the combat mission in 2011, and we wrapped up our far smaller training mission in 2014.

On the diplomatic front, at one point the Canadian embassy in Kabul was second in size only to our embassy in Washington, DC.

By the time that Ashraf Ghani fled the Presidential palace and left Kabul to the mercy of the triumphant Taliban, Canada barely had a skeleton crew of diplomats left on the ground.

Without our own military resources, Canada would have had to rely largely upon U.S. intelligence reports to assess the ongoing situation.

We now know that our American leadership long knew that this war was unwinnable, but lied to the American public in order to retain support for the ongoing expenditure of blood and gold.

To be fair, it must have been difficult for the Pentagon officials to watch the 350,000 strong Afghan security forces that they armed, trained and paid, simply evaporate without a fight. If history were to have repeated itself, the U.S. backed Afghan government forces would have been able to hold major cities such as Kabul, for at least a few years.

When the Soviets withdrew in 1989, the Afghan communist army they had created was able to resist the warlords until 1991. It only fell then because Uzbek warlord Abdul Rashid Dostum switched sides and turned on embattled President Mohammed Najibullah.

For the record, despite a lifetime career laced with treachery, deceit and war crime allegations, Dostum remains a powerful force in Afghanistan even after this latest Taliban victory.

Such is the complexity of the Afghan political landscape. Our Canadian leadership never understood the equation even during our military deployment and certainly had no clue when they embarked on this fool’s errand back in 2002.

The focus of this parliamentary inquiry should not be on how the current government screwed up the exit from Afghanistan in the summer of 2021. It should instead focus on how Canada got itself into such a botched mess in the first place.

It is important that we also investigate how the messaging could have been so misleading during the duration of our military commitment to that conflict.

Stephen Harper’s Conservative government subdued any criticism by claiming that to question the mission was to criticize our soldiers.

Nothing could be further from the truth. They did their duty. The leadership did not do theirs.

ON TARGET: CAF Is Not Immune From Historical Scrutiny

By Scott Taylor

As Canadians become more ‘woke’, we are seeing a growing trend to rename streets and buildings along with the removal of statues dedicated to individuals associated with historical discriminatory racial policies.

There are of course a large number of self-proclaimed traditionalists who loudly object to any revisionist review of our nation’s history.

There is no institution more steeped in its own traditions and ceremony than that of the Canadian Armed Forces.

That being said many of the former battlefield glories may not seem as honourable when viewed through the prism of today’s values.

One case in point would be the 1885 Northwest Rebellion which included the battles of Cut Knife Hill and Batoche.

Those battles and campaigns are still cited as honours on the Regimental Colours of the Queen’s Own Rifles, the Governor General’s Foot Guards and the Royal Canadian Artillery.

Those units were part of the military force dispatched to crush an uprising by the Cree and Assiniboine tribes, allied with Metis leader Louis Riel.

There is no denying that these were battles but to consider it an honour to suppress Indigenous people through military force may no longer appear to be glorious.

I have no doubt that pressure will be applied to have these citations removed from those colours.

Which then brings us to the British-led Nile Expedition 1884 – 1885 in which Canadian volunteers operated rafts to enable Lord Kitchener to invade the Sudan.

To this day the Sudanese view that military assault and subsequent slaughter of their military forces and execution of their Mahdi (leader) as a war crime.

In Ottawa there is a plaque dedicated to the seventeen Canadians who died on that expedition. Yet some might question whether that enterprise is something we should still herald in 2021.

Ditto for the Canadian participation in South Africa from 1899-1902 to assist the British in subduing the Boer settlers. This was the first conflict wherein the concept of concentration camps was used to quell the populace.

Canadian troops were involved in the burning of Boer homes and farms and an estimated 28,000 Boer civilians died in the filthy conditions of those concentration camps.

Yet to this day South Africa along with Paardeberg and Leliefontein are listed proudly as battle honours by the Royal Canadian Dragoons, Royal Canadian Regiment and Lord Strathcona’s Horse.

One way for the military of today to shed any links to these historical actions – and this will sound like heresy to the Colonel Blimp Brigade – would be to thoroughly restructure and rename all of our current military units.

Many of the names currently used are so long out of date as to be laughable and arguably misleading.

Our armoured units have tanks or reconnaissance vehicles, they do not ride horses, yet they bear the names Dragoons, Horse or Hussars. A number of our militia regiments include the term Rifles dating back to an era when the majority of regular army units carried smooth-bore muskets.

As all our infantry and support personnel carry rifles the term Rifles is redundant.

Likewise for those units still bearing the moniker fusiliers. The fusil was a light musket that has not been used since before the turn of the last century.

Of the 49 Regiments in the Primary Reserve, fifteen of those include the title Highlander or Scottish and then there is the Irish Regiment of Canada. While those names may have reflected the general composition of those units when they were founded – many as local militias – but that is hardly the case in 2021.

While we are at it, we could also remove the title ‘Light’ from Princess Patricia’s Canadian Infantry.

The truth is that since being founded at Lansdowne Park in 1914 they have always been infantry. The word ‘Light’ was added as a nod to Hamilton Gault who funded its creation because he thought it sounded cool.

Switching to numbered units may actually make the militia seem more inclusive to those new Canadians who don’t see themselves as Highlanders or Irishmen.

It would also freeze those regimental honours and histories in a time capsule which would insulate them from the current wave of historical scrutiny.

ON TARGET: CAF Top Heavy with Brass: Still

By Scott Taylor

Last Thursday the Trudeau government put their best spin on a very delicate situation by officially announcing that General Wayne Eyre is Canada’s new Chief of the Defence Staff. Eyre had been the acting-CDS since Admiral Art McDonald temporarily stepped aside from the job last March to allow for a police investigation into alleged sexual misconduct.

That investigation was concluded in August with the military police stating there was insufficient evidence to lay criminal or service charges against Admiral McDonald.

Armed with this outcome, McDonald announced that given his vindication, he was prepared to resume his duties as Canada’s top commander.

The Trudeau government rationalized that a ‘lack of evidence’ does not equate to the accused being ‘innocent’ and in the interim left Eyre as the acting-CDS and McDonald in limbo.

Any doubt as to who was going to lead the Canadian Armed Forces forward out of this sexual misconduct crisis was put to rest with the Governor General signing the order to terminate McDonald’s contract last Thursday.

Contrary to many misleading headlines, McDonald was not fired from his job. The CDS and all generals and flag officers serve at the discretion of the federal government.

Which brings us to a question which was raised in another news item last week - that is why does Canada have so many generals and admirals?

The Ottawa Citizen reported that over the past several decades the CAF’s rank and file has shrunk while the ratio of generals to soldiers has steadily increased.

Documents obtained under the Access to Information Act revealed that as of March 31 2021, the regular force had dropped to 65,644 and was commanded by 129 generals and admirals. By contrast, in 1991 there were a total of 85,977 personnel in uniform commanded by 127 generals and admirals.

In rough terms that means that 30 years ago there were approximately 677 personnel for every officer of general rank. Today that ratio is down to just 500 per general.

There was a concerted effort in the mid-1990’s to reduce the rank creep within the CAF and the Liberal government vowed to bring that ratio down to one general per 1,000 personnel.

At that juncture it would have meant reducing the serving 99 generals, through attrition to roughly 70 generals and admirals.

Somewhere along the way that goal was abandoned and slowly but surely the numbers have crept back to the current top heavy bloated state.

In comparison to other military formations the Citizen pointed out that the U.S. Marine Corps has a firm cap of 62 generals for a force that numbers over 180,000 active personnel. That is an impressive ratio of 3,000 marines per general.

Even looking at Canadian military history, we used to have a far better ‘teeth to tail’ composition of our armed forces.

At its zenith in World War 2, the First Canadian Army numbered 251,000 personnel. This was broken down into two corps consisting of five divisions and two independent brigades.

This force was commanded by a total of 72 generals. Admittedly those 72 were Major-General, Lieutenant-Generals and Generals as Brigadiers were not counted as generals during WW2.

However, even if you factor brigadiers into the mix it is at least five times the current ratio and they were actually fighting a war.

Unlike many civilian titles and positions, military rank is normally commensurate with a formation. For instance a Lieutenant-General (three-star) would be a corps commander. A Major-General (two stars) would be divisional commander and a Brigadier-General (one star) would command you guessed it, a brigade.

However in the relatively tiny Canadian military we have no such thing as a Corps formation we have notional divisions and our actual Brigades are commanded by Colonels.

Our allies are not fooled by the amount of maple leafs on our generals shoulders. They care about the military competency that we can bring to the alliance.

In fact having fewer generals would increase the esteem of those senior officers. Creating more of them is equivalent to simply printing more money in that it will only devalue the currency.

ON TARGET: The Roots of Racism in the CAF Run Deep

By Scott Taylor

The Canadian military’s changing policies, regulations and culture are reflective of the shift in our societal values. For instance the current explosion of sexual misconduct scandals within the senior ranks of the Canadian Armed Forces include many allegations of incidents that date back ten, twenty and even thirty years ago.

Up until 1987 women were not allowed to serve in combat arms units or serve aboard warships.

Fast forward to 2021 and we now have women serving at the highest levels of command, with many of those individuals having actual combat experience.

That is an incredible transition within the military culture in a relatively short span of time.

As for the sexual orientation of CAF members, up until 1992 it was illegal to be a homosexual and serve in uniform. Closeted service members were routinely interrogated and summarily dismissed from the forces.

Although a court ruling overturned that military policy in 1992, it was not until 2017 that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau issued a formal apology to all those personnel who had been purged by those discriminatory rules.

It took the Department of National Defence another two years before they issued personal letters of apology to 432 individuals who had been released from service due to their sexual orientation.

The military’s record of racial discrimination has also not been stellar.

During the First World War the enlistment of Black recruits was vehemently opposed by Canada’s top soldier. In April 1916 at the height of the Great War recruiting crisis, General W.G. Gwatkin, Chief of the General Staff issued an official memo that stated, “The civilized negro is vain and imitative; in Canada he is not impelled to enlist by a high sense of duty; in the trenches he is not likely to make a good fighter.”

The problem with Gwatkin’s assessment, besides its outright racism, was that many Black Canadians did wish to enlist and serve in uniform.

While they were not explicitly forbidden to join, Blacks were often rebuffed by the individual commanding officers who had the authority to reject volunteers using their own discretion.

Despite the discrimination and racism, several hundred Black males did manage to enlist.

This created a problem for the military and the solution came about in 1916 when the decision was made to create a segregated unit. The Number 2 Construction Battalion consisted of Black enlisted men with white officers.

As the name implies, they were not to be employed as combat soldiers, but rather as labourers digging trenches and cutting down trees to provide revetment and shelter for the rest of the Canadian Expeditionary Force in Flanders.

Between General Gwatkin’s comments and the creation of a segregated, Black -only labour battalion, it clearly illustrates the prevailing official racism of the times in Canada.

However, in recent years there has been a deliberate effort to celebrate No. 2 Construction Battalion’s contribution to the war efforts as some sort of success story.

This unit’s history was the central theme of the CAF’s annual recognition of Black History month and I even had the occasion to attend a special concert dedicated to this very unique unit.

Like most of the Canadian Expeditionary force, Number 2 Construction Battalion returned to Canada in early 1919 following the November 11th 1918 armistice. The unit was subsequently disbanded in September 1920.

Since that juncture, members of the Black community have persistently lobbied the Canadian government for some sort of formal acknowledgement for No. 2 Construction Battalion.

On March 28 of this year, the Liberal government bowed to that pressure and announced their intention of issuing a formal apology to the descendants of the members of this unit for the racism and discrimination which these Great War veterans faced.

It took all this time, but the powers that be in the Canadian military have finally realized that it was wrong to segregate Black volunteers and make them do menial tasks.

What was until recently something the military celebrated as inclusion is now being apologized for because it is finally being recognized as racism.

The formal apology to descendants is scheduled to take place in Halifax on July 9, 2022.

ON TARGET: Remembrance Day Ceremonies Even More Solemn

Beechwood Cemetery, Remembrance Day Ceremony

Photo Credit: DND: Private Jonathan King

By Scott Taylor

This year’s Remembrance Day ceremonies took on a slightly more somber tone than in years past. It is always a sorrowful occasion, particularly for veterans and their families who reflect upon those loved ones who fell in the service of Canada.

However, with all the martial pomp and ceremony surrounding these ceremonies they were also unwittingly a glorification of war itself.

In the three major wars fought in the previous century, Canadian soldiers had; helped the British empire defeat the Kaiser in 1918, assisted the allies in defeating Hitler’s Nazis and the Japanese in 1945, and fought as part of a U.N coalition that was able to battle the North Korean communists to a standstill in 1953.

We essentially had a record of two wins and a tie and in each of these conflicts our soldiers’ sacrifices had not been in vain.

One could justify the loss of those loved ones with the fact that in victory they had made the world a better place.

The same cannot be said for the conflicts in which Canada has engaged in the current century.

This past summer, Canadian veterans of the war in Afghanistan had to watch with stunned impotence as the Taliban roared back to power in Afghanistan virtually unopposed by the U.S. trained Afghan government forces.

From 2002 until 2014 nearly 40,000 Canadian soldiers were committed to propping up the U.S. installed puppet Afghan government in Kabul.

During that 12-year span of commitment, 158 Canadians were killed, 2,000 were wounded or suffered physical injuries and thousands more suffer the invisible wounds of PTSD.

From a financial perspective it is estimated that Canada will eventually spend $21 billion on that war when one factors in the long-term health care costs for our wounded.

As long as the U.S. and remaining NATO allies continued to prop up the Afghan regime and fund the Afghan security forces, our veterans could hold out hope that their sacrifice could still yield a positive result.

Those hopes were dashed when the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan several months ago and we all witnessed those horrific scenes of terrified Afghans clinging to American air force transport planes in their attempt to flee.

The U.S., NATO and by extension Canada lost the war in Afghanistan. With an expenditure of $2 trillion (U.S) over a 20-year occupation, the most powerful military alliance in the world was defeated by a ragtag bunch of illiterate Islamic extremists.

That is a tough pill for the rah-rah Colonel Blimps who refused to recognize there would never be a victory in Afghanistan and as such continued to take to the airwaves to help convince the Canadian public that we were one new schoolhouse short of success.

Unlike the wars in the previous century where Canadian troops were viewed as defenders and liberators, in Afghanistan we were seen by the local population as unwelcome foreign occupiers.

Thus, this year’s Remembrance ceremonies mark the first time that Canadians have had to mourn fallen soldiers who died in the service of Canada, but because NATO lost the war and the Taliban prevailed, those lives were lost in vain.

Canada has been a direct participant in three other NATO-led conflicts since 1999. That year the RCAF participated in the 78- day bombing campaign against Serbia and Kosovo. Mercifully, there were no casualties among Canadians.

In 2011 Canada was at the forefront of a NATO-led, 10-month campaign to oust Libyan President Muammar Gadaffi. Canada suffered no casualties once again.

After Daesh (aka ISIS or ISIL) swept into Iraq in 2014, Canada deployed fighter jets, trainers and Special Forces to Iraq to counter the threat.

Following the defeat of Daesh in 2017 Canadian troops remain deployed in the region as part of a NATO training initiative. To date Canada has suffered only one fatality and three wounded in a 2015 friendly fire incident in Northern Iraq.

While reflecting on the sacrifice of our soldiers we should also examine closely the results of our military actions.

Kosovo declared independence in 2008 but remains to date a failed state. President Hashim Thaci recently had to step down to face charges of war crimes, including murder and human organ trafficking, which he is alleged to have committed while NATO supported his separatists with an air force which included the RCAF.

Libya descended into violent anarchy as soon as NATO helped the rebels achieve victory. In the lawless violent vacuum created by NATO airpower, Libya is now a failed state.

Under the mandate of Operation Impact, Canada remains committed in Iraq through March 2022.

No one can even define what ‘victory’ will look like in Iraq, but it will not be delivered at NATO gunpoint.

Instead of simply mourning fallen soldiers Canada needs to closer examine how we employ our still serving soldiers.

ON TARGET: Libya Recognition Is Absurd

By Scott Taylor

Last week, seemingly in advance of Remembrance Day commemorations, the Embassy of Canada in Egypt tweeted a Veterans Affairs Canada message, which depicted Canadian sailors aboard HMCS Charlottetown during the war in Libya.

The Embassy’s tweet read “10 years ago [Canadian flag] was one of the first countries to respond to the Libyan people’s demand for democracy. CAF members served in the air and sea, helping to enforce a no-fly zone, evacuate people and patrolling the waters.”

To anyone completely unaware of the current state of affairs in Libya this message would appear to be a salute to the Canadian Armed Forces for a job well done.

To correct this false narrative we need to first look at the fact that it was sent by our embassy in Egypt, not Libya.

The reason for that is that Canada does not staff the embassy in Tripoli because after the fall of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in October 2011, violent anarchy has continued unabated throughout Libya.

There are two main factions, each claiming to be the legitimate government of Libya, propped up by hundreds of warlords with their private militias.

There may have indeed been Libyan voices calling for democracy and Canada may have thought that was the goal when we joined in the fray early on. However by the time the rag-tag assortment of rebels defeated the Gadaffi loyalists it was clear that a Liberal democracy was not going to be the result.

We promised democracy but delivered anarchy to the Libyans.

Contrary to the Embassy’s tweet, Canadian military personnel did not simply enforce a no-fly zone over Libya.

The original U.N mandate was to have an allied NATO led air force authorized to prevent Gadaffi from using his warplanes to inflict revenge bombings on the rebels. Instead the very NATO force that was to prevent Libyans from being bombed then proceeded to bomb those Libyans who were loyal to Gadaffi.

Led by Canadian Lieutenant-General Charles Bouchard, the NATO forces bombed military targets, vital infrastructure and despite their best intentions, inflicted casualties on the very civilians that they were to protect.

Once Gadaffi was brutally executed by jubilant rebels, it was clearly evident that the thugs to whom NATO assisted to win victory were not of the rules based international order.

Predictably chaos ensured, with these heavily armed civilians empowered and unwilling to surrender that power to a civilian authority. Between the unsecured arsenal abandoned by the defeated Gadaffi loyalists and the vast amount of weapons supplied by NATO forces to the rebels, post Gadaffi Libya was awash with weapons and munitions.

This directly led to the Tuareg and al Qaeda of the Islamic Maghreb seizing territory in neighbouring Mali. That conflict continues to the present despite the presence of large French and U.N peacekeeping contingent.

Libya also was the staging area for large number of foreign fighters making their way to fight against the forces of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

It was a two way street however as Daesh (aka ISIS or ISIL) soon found their way back into Libya.

What was a thriving north African, oil-exporting nation just ten years ago is now a failed state, gripped by violent anarchy and lawlessness. One of the darkest elements to this present power-vacuum in Libya are the slave traders who prey upon those migrants trying to make their way to a better life in Europe.

Had Canada contributed to actually bringing democracy, stability and prosperity to Libya one could point to the collateral damage suffered by the population during Gadaffi’s ouster as having to break some eggs in order to make an omelet. Instead, we failed to deliver on democracy and in doing so removed the pre-existing stability and prosperity from the Libyan people. Essentially we broke a lot of eggs and left them to rot.

This is no way the fault of the members of the CAF who participated in this war. They did what their government ordered them to do. It is the government of Canada along with our willing allies who failed to deliver in Libya.

To have the Canadian embassy salute the anniversary of this catastrophe is disturbing in the extreme.

ON TARGET: Trudeau’s Choice of New Defence Minister Sends Message

By Scott Taylor

In naming his new cabinet, Prime Minister Trudeau has finally relieved long serving Minister of National Defence Harjit Sajjan of his embattled portfolio.

Since February the Canadian Armed Forces senior command have been immersed in a still raging string of military sexual misconduct scandals. Despite the fact that Sajjan had announced yet another external review of the military’s sexualized culture last April, critics felt that his handling of this crisis was weak and ineffective.

Taking the helm from Sajjan will be Anita Anand.

She is new to federal politics as she was first elected to parliament in 2019. However, she is seen as a rising star within the Liberal party and was gained kudos for her handling of the COVID-19 vaccination acquisition as Canada’s procurement minister.

The fact that Anand is a woman, potentially sends out the signal to CAF survivors and victims of sexual misconduct that the government is finally serious about tackling the current crisis.

At her swearing in ceremony, Anand told reporters she plans to bring herself up to speed on her new department as quickly as possible.

Here’s a piece of free advice for the new Minister: What you are inheriting from Sajjan is not a mere dumpster fire, this is a towering inferno of sexual misconduct and it is burning from the top down. There were nine top military commanders involved in some level of a sexual misconduct scandal.

Without stability and continuity among the senior CAF leadership, Anand will have her hands full just trying to build a solid foundation from which to staff any sort of cultural reform within the ranks.

At present, the CAF is facing both a recruitment and a retention problem among their membership due to the almost continuous stream of sexual misconduct revelations that have been brought to the forefront by the media.

Many of the allegations being brought against the senior commanders are of a historic nature, dating back ten, twenty and in a couple of cases, thirty years, when these officers were young men.

In no way does the passage of time diminish or negate these allegations.

However, when one turns back the hands of time and looks at the military culture that existed three decades ago, it is actually encouraging to realize how far the CAF has evolved in just a short period of time.

Up until 1987 women were not allowed to serve in combat units and they were not allowed to sail on warships.

We currently have Lt-Gen Frances Allen serving as Canada’s first female Vice Chief of Defence Staff. There is also Lt-Gen Jennie Carignan serving as Chief of Professional Conduct and Culture.

Carignan not only served as a combat officer, she most recently commanded Canada’s battle group in Iraq.

At the Royal Military College, the new commandant is Commodore Josee Kurtz, the institution’s first ever female to head the college. Her last operational post was as Commodore of the NATO Standing Squadron serving in the Mediterranean.

Up until 1992 when a court challenge overturned the CAF policy, it wa illegal to be gay and serve in uniform.

The military had no choice but to accept the ruling, which overturned their discriminatory practices. However it was not until 2017 that the federal government issued a formal apology to all of those who had been purged from the ranks as a result of their sexual orientation.

Service members are now authorized to wear their uniforms in pride parades.

Anand should be encouraged by the fact the military has belatedly and slowly changed over the decades.

But that it can change should give her hope of possible success.

ON TARGET: Military Sexual Misconduct: The Beat Goes on…and on

By Scott Taylor

On February 7, 1981 a Soviet Navy Tupolev-104 passenger plane crashed immediately after taking off from the Pushkin airbase near St. Petersburg. All 50 passengers aboard were killed including the Commander of the Soviet Pacific fleet and 27 other top ranking naval officers.

This decapitation of the entire senior leadership of the Pacific Fleet was first suspected to be an act of war precipitating an actual U.S. attack. Once a thorough investigation of the wreckage had been conducted the Soviet authorities were able to conclude that the crash was in fact caused by the plane being grossly overloaded.

These top officers had used their time in St. Petersburg to stock up on luxury items that were at that time unavailable in the far east of the Soviet Union. They then used their rank to over-rule the aircraft’s pilot into attempting a takeoff with an unsafe load.

In other words, the Soviet Pacific fleet decapitated themselves.

Those of us who closely monitor the activities of the Canadian Armed Forces have been watching a similar circumstance unfold amongst our military’s senior leadership. And, like those Soviet commanders, the damage being done is self-inflicted.

At time of writing Canada has had a total of nine of this country’s top military officers under investigation; on a paid leave while suspended, retired early, or a combination of the above, because of allegations of sexual misconduct.

There are numerous other stories of more junior commanders facing similar circumstances for the same reason, but there is not enough space to list them all.

So to recap just the top nine and the rapid succession in which they entered the public spotlight for their alleged sexual misconduct, here goes.

First up it was just retired Chief of Defence Staff General Jonathan Vance. He had barely stepped aside as CDS, when Global National News alleged he had had a 20-year extramarital affair with a subordinate, and that he had sent another subordinate an email invitation in 2012 to accompany him to a clothing optional beach resort.

Following a military investigation Vance now faces a single count of obstruction for allegedly asking the subordinate to lie to investigators about the affair.

Twenty two days after the Vance story broke, it was announced that his successor, Admiral Art McDonald was stepping aside to allow a sexual misconduct claim against him to be investigated. We now know that McDonald’s alleged misconduct occurred during a drunken party aboard a frigate in 2010.

It is alleged that McDonald pushed the face of another male officer into a female sailor’s breasts after one of her blouse buttons came loose.

The military investigators found insufficient evidence to lay a charge. McDonald has recently claimed he has been ‘exonerated’ and wants his job back. The military police have subsequently said that not laying a charge is not an exoneration; they simply didn’t have enough credible witnesses who were sober enough to testify with clarity.

Odds are that McDonald ain’t coming back. 

Shortly after McDonald was placed under investigation, it was learned that air force Lt-Gen Chris Coates’ extra-marital affair while at NORAD precluded him from a post at NATO HQ. He retired early.

Then we had allegations that Chief of Military Personnel (CMP), Vice Admiral Haydn Edmundson had committed sexual assault against a shipmate in 1991. That allegation is still under investigation.

Maj-Gen Dany Fortin was the face of the federal vaccine roll-out until he was relieved of that post accused of a 1989 incident while he was a cadet at military college. He has since been charged in civilian court on one count of sexual assault.

Maj-Gen Pete Dawe was sent on paid leave on May 2 due to the public backlash over him writing a character reference for an officer who was convicted of sexually assaulting a fellow officer’s wife.

Dawe was quietly brought back to active duty until the media reported his new job was to help on reforms to the way the military handles sexual misconduct.  He is back on paid leave.

Vice Chief of Defence staff, Lt.-Gen. Mike Rouleau took early retirement after it was learned he had the poor judgment to play golf with Gen. Vance while the former CDS was under investigation.

The most recent two suspensions came in rapid succession when it was revealed that Lt-Gen Trevor Cadieu and Lt-Gen Steve Whelan are both facing investigations into alleged sexual misconducts. Cadieu was to take command of the Canadian Army and Whelan had replaced the ousted Edmundson as the CMP.

Like the Soviets in 1981, it must seem to those at National Defence Headquarters that our military leadership is under attack. It is, but like the Soviet plane crash, this from within.

ON TARGET: Time for Canada to Quit Iraq War

By Scott Taylor

On Sunday October 10, Iraqi citizens went to the polls to elect a new parliament. Given that this coincided with Thanksgiving, it is no surprise that this story garnered barely a mention in the Canadian media.

This was unfortunate as this election result should concern Canadian citizens for the simple reason that the military is authorized to have up to 850 personnel deployed in the region on a mission known as Operation Impact.

As well as supporting security operations in Lebanon and Jordan, the Liberal government’s objective for Op Impact states that it is “in support of the Global Coalition and NATO [to] improve Iraqi security forces’ capabilities.” These efforts help Iraq to achieve long term success in keeping its territory and people secure.”

That sounds like a noble gesture, but the long and the short of it is that we are training Iraqi troops to prop up the government therefore we Canadians should probably pay attention to who is leading that government.

To date, Iraq’s attempt to establish a functioning democracy after the U.S invaded and toppled dictator Saddam Hussein in 2003, cannot be described as a resounding success.

There have been five parliamentary elections staged since the American occupation in 2003. The 2018 election was a garbled farce. When the Iraqi officials could not determine a verifiable result, a full recount was ordered. But before that could happen the central warehouse containing the ballots was burned to the ground.

The result has been an inefficient Iraqi government in the interim, rife with corruption and unable to deliver basic utilities to an ever more impatient populace. In the months leading up to the latest parliamentary election, there have been a number of violent demonstrations across Iraq calling for an end to the corruption.

With the early result tabulated, it appears that the big winner of the election – taking 73 of 329 seats – is a chap named Muqtada al-Sadr.

If that name sounds vaguely familiar it is because during the U.S. occupation he was listed as America’s “public enemy number one.”

He is a Shiite fundamentalist cleric who doubled as an anti-American warlord. When his fanatical followers rose up against the U.S. forces in 2004 al-Sadr taunted the Americans with billboards adorned with his giant portrait and the slogan – in English – “All men belong to me.”

So he is just a little crazy.

His militia are known as Sadrists and they were mobilized in 2014 when Daesh (aka ISIS or ISIL) burst into Iraq from Syria and the U.S. trained Iraqi government army simply melted away.

As part of that Global coalition deployed to counter Daesh, Canadian troops were in fact in a loose alliance with these Sadrists.

Following the successful defeat of Daesh in the City of Mosul in 2017. Shiite militiamen, including Sadrists were accused of war crimes. Canadian military trainers were subsequently shown videos of these crimes being committed.

In an official DND document it was noted that “these acts included violence pertaining to rape, torture and execution.” The report further detailed that the videos included “raping a woman to death; the torture and execution of a line of bound prisoners whereby they were beaten to death by what appeared to be a rebar steel bar; and the execution of a man by hanging him from the barrel of a [main battle tank]”

The Canadian instructors raised this issue with their superiors in theatre because the men committing these crimes were the very Iraqi recruits whom they were training. The immediate response from the Canadian chain of command was to carry on with the training and to stop watching the videos.

Now that it appears Muqtada al-Sadr will form the next coalition to rule Iraq. It would seem that, like Afghanistan, the U.S. effort in Iraq has produced a far from desirable result.

As a fierce nationalist, Sadr has repeatedly stated that he wants foreign troops off Iraqi soil.

Rather than keep flogging a dead horse and maintaining Operation Impact to its next parliament-approved deadline of March 2022, Canada should get our troops out of there now. It was a mission that never had a clear objective once Daesh was defeated in 2018. Like Afghanistan, there will be no victory parade when the war in Iraq finally peters out.

We did our bit. Now bring our troops home. The Sadrists can prop up their own leader without our assistance.

ON TARGET: Another DND Self Inflicted PR Wound

By Scott Taylor

Last week Ottawa Citizen reporter David Pugliese broke the story that Maj.-Gen. Peter Dawe had been quietly assigned a new post and brought back to work. Dawe had earlier fallen from grace when it was revealed earlier this year that in 2017 he had written a positive character reference for a fellow officer after that individual had been found guilty on various criminal charges, not the least of which being sexual assault.
The victim of the sexual assault was the wife of a fellow officer in the Princess Patricia’s Canadian Light Infantry. She was also a former soldier herself.

Partly on the strength of Dawe's letter and a separate character reference from the PPCLI association, the judge in the case placed the convicted perpetrator – Maj. Jon Hamilton on probation rather than issuing him a jail sentence.
Unfortunately for Hamilton he was later convicted of another, unrelated sexual assault, and the judge in that trial put him behind bars on a three-year sentence.
The story that Dawe had written a letter of support for a sex offender was made worse by the fact that he had not expressed empathy for the victim and he had ignored the expressed wish of her husband to not support Hamilton in this instance.

Recently Dawe was quietly returned to a job at National Defence headquarters. His new position was not to be just any old job, but rather he was to work in a role involving responses to the various reviews looking into sexual misconduct in the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) as well as the much maligned military justice system.

There was no fanfare of official announcement for Dawe's new assignment, but obviously his selection for this job did not sit well with fellow officers. Hence one (or more) informed Pugliese who was subsequently able to confirm the details. Again, the news of this sparked a backlash from sexual misconduct survivor groups, political opposition parties and anyone who understands common sense and bad optics.
The backlash was so swift and severe that Acting Chief of the Defence Staff, Gen. Wayne Eyre almost immediately rescinded the post. It would have been Eyre who approved Dawe of being back and given him that job, but it was Vice Chief of Defence Staff, Lt.-Gen. Frances Allen who made the formal announcement that Dawe would not be immediately going into that new position. Perhaps the military felt that putting a female face on the change of Dawe's appointment would make it look like they are finally "getting it".

Unfortunately, the underhanded way in which they tried to quietly resurrected Dawe in this new role appears to prove Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to be correct in his assessment. "It is obvious that despite the work the military has done, despite the work that we have done, the military still doesn't get that survivors need to be at the centre, and the unique priority of everything in regards to sexual misconduct and harassment in the military," said Trudeau to reporters, adding "this shows they simply still don’t get it."

Regrettably, Trudeau blanket statement should have been more targeted at the very senior command level of the CAF.

The fact that the news of Dawe's appointment generated enough internal reaction that it was subsequently leaked to the Ottawa Citizen, means that many of the rank and file do in fact "get it".

Gen. Eyre and the senior command must have known there was potential for such a backlash as the entire Canadian military has been engulfed in a steady stream of sexual misconduct scandals for the past eight months. That was why they kept it on the down low. For his part, Maj.-Gen. Dawe - who is by all accounts an outstanding combat soldier - should have known better than to accept a job involving the review of military sexual misconduct. This was yet another entirely avoidable black eye for the CAF senior command.

ON TARGET: DND Information Wars: A Lack of Accountability

By Scott Taylor

Last week the Canadian Armed Forces were pummeled with yet another self-inflicted wound to their public trust. The Ottawa Citizen reported the stunning news that certain military leaders viewed the COVID-19 pandemic as a welcome opportunity to employ propaganda techniques against the Canadian public.

To be clear, this initiative was not directed by the Liberal government, and when the country’s top general got wind of the scheme he shut it down post haste.

In fact, not only did then Chief of Defence staff, General Jonathan Vance terminate the operation, he also later brought in retired Maj.-Gen. Daniel Gosselin to investigate just how this plan was hatched in the first place.

It was the findings in Gosselin’s report which provided the genesis for the latest Citizen story.

This fittingly brings us full circle as it was Citizen reporter David Pugliese who first broke the story in the spring of 2020.

As it gets a bit confusing and involves a number of separate yet related issues, I will do my best to recap the sequence of events.

In April 2020, almost as soon as it was being implemented, Pugliese reported that the military’s Canadian Joint Operation’s Command (CJOC) planned to employ propaganda techniques on the Canadian public as part of Operation Laser, the CAF’s response to the pandemic.

It was also reported that a separate initiative, this one involving officers working under the direction of military intelligence, was put in place to cull information from social media accounts in Ontario. This initiative also included military personnel compiling data about Black Lives Matter leaders and their gatherings.

The Citizen stories sparked public outrage and General Vance ordered the CJOC scheme shut down. The data mining initiative was allowed to continue. For his part, Minister of National Defence Harjit Sajjan promised his fellow parliamentarians that these highly questionable activities by Canada’s military had been cancelled.

The CBC later reported that in fact some of those activities had continued unabated until Vance sent out written orders.

That prompted the review by Gosselin, which although completed in December 2020, is only now being released under the Access to Information Act.

What Gosselin’s findings now reveal is that this was not simply the wayward ideology of a rogue military propaganda specialist. It is clear from his report that Gosselin was convinced this represented the collective mindset of the CJOC senior commanders who viewed the pandemic as a “unique opportunity” to test out their theories.

Around the same time that the Citizen first began reporting these anomalies it was also revealed that the Canadian military had already spent more than $1 million to train public affairs officers on behavior modification techniques similar to those used by the parent firm of Cambridge Analytics, a company which was implicated in 2016 data – mining scandal aimed at boosting Donald Trump’s U.S. Presidential campaign.

That training initiative was the brainchild of Brig.-Gen. Jay Janzen, who was at the time the senior officer in the Public Affairs Branch.

The military leadership also formally shut down another one of Janzen’s initiatives, this one a controversial plan which news reports pointed out would have allowed military public affairs officers to use propaganda to change attitudes and behaviors of Canadians as well as collect and analyze information from the public’s social media accounts.

When the news of Canada’s military using military psyops on their own citizens became public, it did not take long to realize how badly that plan backfired.

A story in Vice World News last week reported that “The Canadian Armed Forces attempt to combat misinformation only ended up giving conspiracy theorists another way to spread it.”

Apparently QAnon forums, Covid-conspiracy Telegram groups and something called 4chan are claiming that the CAF’s plan to modify behavior among the population is further damning proof of the government’s great COVID-19 conspiracy.

Despite the fact that Canada’s senior brass shut these initiatives down and ordered investigations into their origins, no one has been sanctioned for these actions.

Even now that it is increasingly clear how this has eroded public trust in the military institution, not one officer has been held to account.

For his part, Janzen has since retired and taken a senior civilian position in communications with NATO.

Just wait until the conspiracy theorists dig their teeth into the fact that Janzen is now in a position to influence the communications strategy for all 30 nation states within the alliance.

That cannot be very reassuring.

ON TARGET: National Day for Truth and Reconciliation: Time for Personal Reflection

By Scott Taylor

The current sense of national shame began on May 28 with the media reports of some 200 unmarked graves discovered on the grounds of the former Kamloops Indian Residential School in British Columbia. The majority of those bodies are believed to be those of Indigenous students attending the facility. 

Then in rapid succession came the reported findings of more unmarked graves at four other former residential schools; Brandon, Manitoba, Marieval, Saskatchewan, Cranbrook, BC and Kuper Island, BC. The largest single discovery was at Marieval with an estimated 751 graves, putting the collective total at just under 1400. There are presently 21 investigations underway in search of additional unmarked graves at former residential schools. It is estimated the number could climb to 4100 bodies. 

The implementation of the residential school system dates back to its authorization by then Prime Minister Sir John A. Macdonald on July 1, 1883.

Macdonald's stated goal was to isolate Indigenous children from their families and to cut all ties they had to their culture. In hindsight this practice has been widely denounced as a form of cultural genocide. These graveyard discoveries suddenly put an entirely new spin on things, and Canadians were shocked to discover this sad chapter in our nation’s history. 

The public outpouring of emotion was immediate with demonstrators wearing orange and carrying signs proclaiming ‘All lives matter’. In many towns and cities across Canada, statues of Macdonald were either vandalized or toppled. As early as June, the Trudeau Liberals ordered flags to be flown at half-mast in recognition of this historical tragedy. To date they remain there as no one quite knows what would be a suitable marker signifying that we have paid proper respect to the victims. Some have suggested that the new September 30, National Day for Truth and Reconciliation federal statutory holiday would be that occasion. 

For me these revelations of systemic Indigenous abuse actually caused me for the first time to further research my own familial roots. Growing up in Toronto I knew that my maternal grandmother Pauline was a Mohawk born on the Six Nation of the Grand Reserve near Brantford, Ontario.

Our family also knew that Pauline had left the reserve in 1930 at the age of 16, soon after married my grandfather –a Scotsman, and by doing so she cut all ties with her Mohawk roots. By marrying a ’non-Indian’ she legally lost her status as an ‘Indian’.

Given the current attention on this subject, I now know that under the terms of the 1885 Indian Act it would have been mandatory for Pauline to attend the Mohawk Residential Institute at Brantford until the age of 16.

This particular school was notorious for its abuse of students. The food quality was substandard and the school was nicknamed the ‘Mush Hole’ by attendees. Students who ‘escaped’ were placed in a purpose-built prison in the school’s basement. Described as essentially a dark closet, students would kept in there for days at a time. Shock treatment for the infraction of bed wetting and the close cropped hair for males and females led to the students being referred to as ‘Mush Hole baldies’. 

In 1985 under Canada’s new Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the previous law was changed, allowing those Indigenous women married to ‘non-Indians’ to reclaim their status. However by that juncture Pauline was 71 years old and had been cut off from the reserve for 55 years. As a result, not only myself, but my sister and our cousins were never connected to our Indigenous relatives. That is going to change. Through my maternal aunts and uncles I am starting to assemble the genesis of a family tree and I plan to reach out to Pauline’s extended family on this first ever National Day for Truth and Reconciliation holiday.

ON TARGET: Is the new AUKUS Alliance a Snub to Canada?

By Scott Taylor

At the United Nation’s general assembly in New York, U.S. President Joe Biden, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, and U.K Prime Minister Boris Johnson used the occasion to announce a new security pact between the three countries.

Under the terms of the new agreement, the U.S. and U.K will agree to furnish Australia with advanced nuclear propulsion technology for their proposed submarine fleet.

In announcing the deal, Biden made the claim that “The United States has no closer or more reliable ally than Australia.”

The fact that even in making that statement Biden could not remember Morrison’s name, would seem to take the gravitas out of this ‘best buddy’ moniker.

Nevertheless, a single quip of hollow praise was enough to set off squeals of protests by Canadian defence cheerleaders.

With their logic it is somehow proof of the Trudeau Liberal’s neglect of our military that we are being left out of this exclusive new military alliance.

One of talking points used by Biden, Morrison and Johnson was that this new agreement would allow Australia to bolster the collective counter balance to China’s growing military threat in the Pacific.

Not mentioned by these three amigos was the fact that Australia already had a contract with France to supply them with nuclear propelled submarines, valued at an estimated $66 billion.

This little item was not lost on the French government-owned shipbuilder the Naval Group, who have already demanded massive cancellation costs from the Australians.

This was not an alliance formed to thwart China. It was simply a creation of convenience aimed at cutting France’s grass on a major military procurement project.

As Trudeau pointed out to reporters who questioned him regarding our exclusion from this new club, Canada is not in the process of acquiring nuclear-powered submarines.

As for ramping up our collective defence forces to counter China’s burgeoning military muscle, Canada is in fact already keeping pace.

China and Canada both spend approximately 1.3% of their respective GDP’s on defence spending.

As such both countries would be considered ‘laggards’ by former U.S. President Donald Trump for failing to meet the NATO objective of 2% GDP on defence.

Speaking of NATO, if the U.S. and U.K can undermine NATO ally France and create their own mini-alliance with Australia, maybe it is time for Canada to rethink our own membership in NATO?

Canada was an original member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which was formed in 1949 to counter the post WW2 threat of Soviet Union expansion in Europe.

In response to the threat of NATO, the Soviet Union formed its own alliance called the Warsaw Pact.

Throughout the Cold War the threated seemed real, and I’m proud to wear my NATO medal for my military service in West Germany during the 1980’s.

However, by 1991, the Soviet Union was dissolved and the former Warsaw Pact members began clamoring for admission into NATO.

At the end of the Cold War there were 16 members of NATO. Since the collapse of the entity they were collectively bound to defend against, that alliance now sits at 30 members.

On the flip side, what was once a combined 15 Soviet Socialist Republics and seven Warsaw Pact members, is now the solitary Russian Federation.

Of course, without the threat of a Soviet invasion, NATO has adopted a far more aggressive mandate than a simple pledge of collective defence by member states.

In 1999, NATO waged a 78-day air war against Yugoslavia, took over the occupation of Afghanistan in 2002, bombed Libya for 10 months in 2011 and entered Iraq to combat Daesh in 2014.

Of those four at bats, NATO has yet to squarely hit the ball out of the park.

Kosovo declared its independence in 2008, but remains unrecognized by European union and the U.N. It remains a failed state in the center of Europe.

Afghanistan just recently fell to the Taliban after NATO’s 20-year failed occupation. Libya has been gripped by violent anarchy since the NATO bombing toppled President Gadhafi in October 2011.

As for Iraq, I’ll predict right now that ain’t gonna end well either.

I think it’s safe to say that NATO is fully capable of losing foreign adventures without Canada’s ‘laggard’ contribution. 

ON TARGET: Canada Is as Bad at Winning Wars as we are at Losing Wars

By Scott Taylor

With the Taliban firmly back in control in Afghanistan, many Canadian veterans of that war are conflicted in their emotions. They question the sacrifice of those 158 comrades who made the ultimate sacrifice, the two thousand fellow veterans who bear the scars of battle injuries and the untold legion of those soldiers suffering from the invisible wounds of PTSD.

The embarrassing withdrawal of U.S. military personnel from Kabul, and the complete evaporation of the U.S. armed and equipped Afghan security forces has eliminated any doubt about the war’s outcome.

The U.S. led NATO intervention which lasted twenty years and costing over $2 trillion has ended in bitter defeat.

The world’s most sophisticated and technologically advanced military alliance was bested by a largely illiterate rabble of poorly armed zealots. One of the most difficult pills for our veterans to swallow is the fact that the Taliban and other Afghan insurgents never won a single set piece battle against NATO troops.

It was instead just a relentless series of ambushes, suicide attacks and improvised explosive devices that eroded NATO’s will to extend their occupation in perpetuity.

Canada can infact take some solace in the fact that our government ‘cut and ran’ from this conflict long before its humbling conclusion.

Canada’s training mission in Afghanistan was wrapped up in the early spring of 2014, but the main combat mission in Kandahar was aborted in late 2011.

There were a number of hawkish pundits and Colonel Blimp tub-thumpers who chastised the Harper Conservatives for bringing the troops home early.

However, none of those soldiers who served in theatre held the notion that there would one day be a glorious victory parade after peace spontaneously broke out across Afghanistan.

When the last of our soldiers were safely back on Canadian soil, the military staged a “day of Honour” on Parliament Hill to commemorate those who had served in Afghanistan. The war we had walked away from was still raging and everyone knew we didn’t win anything.

At that juncture the die hard war mongers claimed that it was too soon for us to assess whether or not our expenditure of blood and treasure was worth the investment.

Now that the Taliban have clearly won the war, that answer is a resounding ‘no’.

What is interesting is that while we are still hand wringing and lamenting Canada’s contribution to a lost cause which we quit 10 years ago, almost no one mentions the war that we won that same year.

From March to October 2011, the Canadian military spearheaded a NATO led allied intervention in Libya. Canadian Lt-Gen Charlie Bouchard was the commander of the overall NATO mission, the RCN deployed HMCS Charlottetown, the RCAF flew bombing missions as well as psychological warfare operations and the Canadian Special Operations Regiment (CSOR) assisted the Libyan rebels.

After the NATO assisted Libyan rebels toppled and executed President Moammar Gadhaffi the Harper government proudly staged a patriotic victory parade, complete with an RCAF flypast on Parliament Hill on November 24 2011.

It should be noted that of the seventeen allied countries that contributed military muscle to Bouchard’s NATO effort in Libya, only Canada trumpeted Gadhaffi’s defeated with a martial parade.

There is a good reason why the Libya war registers barely a footnote in Canada’s military history. As a feat of arms, NATO defeating Libya was like a prize fighter crushing a toddler.

Secondly, despite the fact that Canada declared ‘victory’ the civil war in Libya never ended. With the death of Gadhaffi, Libya descended into anarchy with hundreds of warlords carrying out personal fiefdoms. To this day, Libya remains gripped in a multi-factional, bloody internal conflict.

So to revisit the war that Canada ‘won’ would mean examining the aftermath of our involvement in a foreign war.

It turns out we were just as bad at winning in Libya as we were at losing in Afghanistan.

ON TARGET: Taliban Not Living Up to Their Terrifying Hype

By Scott Taylor

Last week, the former Hamid Karzai International Airport was back in business under the new moniker of Kabul International Airport (aka KIA). The first flight to lift off from KIA was a Qatar Airlines charter carrying an estimated 200 foreign nationals including a number of Canadians.

Apparently the airport is being managed by the same Afghanistan Civil Aviation authority which operated the facility prior to the Taliban seizing power last month. Two Afghan airlines – Kam Air and Ariana Afghan Airlines have announced plans to resume flying regular routes out of Kabul in the coming days.

This anti-climatic, virtually bloodless return to near normalcy is almost as shocking as the Taliban’s lightning overthrow of President Ashraf Ghani’s regime.

When the Taliban-of-old captured Kabul in 1996, they hanged former opponents from traffic control towers in the central square.

Fear of such bloody reprisals led to those scenes of desperation during the U.S. led allied airlift out of Kabul prior to Aug. 31.

Most analysts believed that when the last U.S. plane lifted off the runway that the revenge bloodletting would begin.

For Canadian veterans of the war in Afghanistan, the fear was that those Afghans who had supported our mission such as translators and support staff would be at risk of Taliban vengeance.

Throughout the summer appeals by veteran’s groups rose to a crescendo as the Taliban rapidly captured town after town in quick succession.

Admittedly, this was not the Canadian government’s finest moment. Global Affairs Canada agreed to restart an earlier program to evacuate Afghans and their families who would be at risk.

However, with the Taliban advancing on the Afghan capital virtually unopposed throughout July, Canada’s ambassador returned to Canada on stress leave.

With the Taliban at the gates of Kabul, the decision was made to repatriate the rest of the embassy staff, and the Canadian authorities were subsequently hard pressed to screen applicants from the safety of Ottawa.

The poor handling of this affair has led to an almost rabid response from many veterans’ groups and media pundits.

I’m not going to defend the Liberal government’s actions in this instance.  However it would be unfair not to offer up a little context.

First of all, Canada concluded it’s military training mission in Afghanistan in the spring of 2014. Our major combat mission was concluded in 2011.

At those junctures, the war mongering military pundits chastised the Conservative government of Stephen Harper for ‘cutting and running’ from a challenging war.

Their line of reasoning was that our troops would miss out on the eventual victory parade. No one, other than Afghans predicted this would end in a Taliban triumph.

My library includes over thirty book titles written by Canadians about the war in Afghanistan.

The list of authors includes generals, soldiers, doctors, historians and journalists. While they all include elements of the challenges posed by the Afghan insurgency, not one of them foretells an outcome wherein the Taliban emerge victorious.

One book, published in 2018 and authored by Afghan war veteran Major General, (ret’d) David Fraser is misleadingly entitled Operation Medusa: The furious battle that saved Afghanistan from the Taliban.

Given that the public narrative from these well placed individuals with personal Afghanistan experience all projected a sense that if not already achieved, than an ultimate victory was nigh, why would any Canadian government have made it a priority to evacuate our former Afghan employees?

No one was predicting that individuals who had last supported our combat mission more than a decade ago would be imperiled by an enemy that our top military commanders had proclaimed defeated.

By the time this crisis erupted with lightning speed, the Canadian resources necessary to handle this mess were long since withdrawn from Afghanistan.

Those veterans who have stepped up by volunteering their time and money to evacuate former interpreters are to be commended for their noble efforts.

The blame for the Canadian government’s failing to handle this crisis in a timely manner, partly rests on the shoulders of those who circulated the false notion of allied success.

We can only pray that this new incarnation of the Taliban remains a kinder, gentler version of itself and that airlifts to safety replaces vengeful bloodletting.

ON TARGET: Afghanistan: The Writing Was On The Wall

By Scott Taylor

Now that the last U.S. air force plane has departed the Hamid Karzai International airport in Kabul, western analysts and pundits remain shell shocked at the Taliban’s lightning overthrow of the Afghan regime.

More accurately, military experts are wondering how the Afghan security force, with a payroll strength of 350,000 U.S.-trained personnel, and equipped with an arsenal valued at over $100 billion could simply dissolve without a fight.

U.S. President Joe Biden and the U.S. intelligence community had all banked on the Afghan government forces holding back the Taliban for six months to one year after the American troop withdrawal.

This window would have allowed the U.S. to get their people out of Afghanistan, but more importantly it would have dimmed the western media spotlight.

With western media out of the country and no U.S. soldiers involved, the ultimate fall of President Ashraf Ghani’s government would have garnered but a couple of paragraphs on page 17 of the world news section of Canadian newspapers.

Instead, Ghani and his not so loyal security forces easily read the American playbook. Knowing there was no long term future possible, Ghani did not attempt to rally his troops for one final face-saving last stand in Kabul.

Instead, Ghani proved himself to be a corrupt thief to the bitter end. He grabbed a reported $160 million and fled to the United Arab Emirates.

With Ghani gone, the Afghan security forces had no reason to continue showing up for work.

They also know the value of weapons, ammunition and armoured vehicles. They would have been foolish in the extreme to employ their vast arsenal against the Taliban in order to simply delay the inevitable.

They were never going to keep fighting and dying for an American installed corrupt puppet who fled into exile, to simply spare their former U.S. masters the embarrassment of being routed by the Taliban.

Ironically, the intact arsenal which the Taliban now find themselves in possession, is too enormous for them to absorb. There are news reports that much of the hardware the Taliban captured is being sold to Iran.

That has got to irk the brass hats at the Pentagon.

Anyone familiar with the history of Afghanistan would realize that once the last foreign soldiers has been driven from their soil, the various Afghan factions will resort to fighting each other.

This has already begun with the son of the revered former Tajik warlord Shah Massoud proclaiming to lead the anti-Taliban resistance from his stronghold in the Panjshir valley.

Bolstering Ahmad Massoud’s claim to legitimacy was the presence of Afghanistan’s self-proclaimed acting President, Amrullah Saleh. Following the last Presidential election Saleh was named Afghanistan’s first Vice-President. With Ghani in exile, Saleh professes that constitutionally that means the presidency is now in his hands.

Nevertheless, it might have been wiser for Saleh to resist the Taliban at the head of the former Afghan Army which still had the U.S. air force in support rather than organizing a handful of fighters in a remote valley.

Allying themselves with Massoud’s resistance movement are two former notorious warlords, Atta Noor and Marshal Abdul Rashid Dostum.

Noor is an ethnic Tajik, while Dostum is an Uzbek. For decades they have ruled over Mazar-i-Sharif and Sheberghan respectively, first as warlords and then under the moniker of governor as part of the U.S. installed Kabul regime.

Neither Noor or Dostum’s private militia’s resisted the Taliban in support of Ghani’s government forces.

In typical Afghan fashion, they cut a deal not to interfere until after Ghani was removed. They are now hoping to use their military muscle to negotiate with the Taliban for a share in the spoils.

For those looking to understand just how the Canadian government could have been so wrong about our involvement in Afghanistan, we need to look at the self-delusion of the key players.

In 2007, I met with Canadian Ambassador Chris Alexander in Kabul. At that juncture he chastised me for having interviewed Dostum at his stronghold in Shebirghan.

According to Alexander, I was wrong to give Dostum any sort of publicity because he was a remnant of the old warlord regime – a thing of the past.

Dostum went on to serve as Vice President in the Ghani regime, and is now back on the board as a key player in this new Taliban era.

Alexander’s inaccurate view that Dostum was a remnant of Afghanistan’s past revealed just how little the youthful ambassador grasped the complexity of the Afghan political landscape.  Alexander saw only what he wanted to see.

Unfortunately far too many Canadians put their faith in his flawed judgment. The writing was always on the wall but our senior leadership did not know how to read it.