Canada and Kazakhstan: A Comparison of Military Reformations

Well trained, well disciplined and highly motivated the Kazakhstan Armed Forces are looking to expand their presence on Global Peacekeeping Operations

Well trained, well disciplined and highly motivated the Kazakhstan Armed Forces are looking to expand their presence on Global Peacekeeping Operations

By: Scott Taylor

Back on 7 June, the Liberal government unveiled their long awaited defence policy review which they entitled “Strong, Secure, Engaged.” The gist of the plan will see defence spending increase steadily over the next decade from the current $18.9 billion to approximately $32.7 billion by fiscal year 2026-27. The policy review contained a list of future equipment acquisitions, but for keen eyed observers of Canada’s military, the majority of these hardware items were already on the military’s requirement lists. There were modest increases announced to the manning levels of both Regular and Reserve forces, but there was certainly no drastic change in course for the Canadian military.

The Kazakh military gets a lot of bang for the buck. WIth a budget just one-tenth that of Canada's they field a formidable fleet of 300 main battle tanks

The Kazakh military gets a lot of bang for the buck. WIth a budget just one-tenth that of Canada's they field a formidable fleet of 300 main battle tanks

The increase in Canadian military spending was tweeted out by U.S. President Trump as “proof” that NATO countries were getting his message about spending a minimum 2% of GDP on national defence. While of course Trudeau liberals denied they were appeasing Trump there was virtually no reformation to defence policy despite months of cross-country consultations prior to them drafting “Strong, Secure, Engaged.”

The same month that Canada announced this future defence blueprint I was to attend the Eurasian Media Forum conference in Kazakhstan. By fortuitous coincidence I received a letter-to-the-editor just prior to my departure from reader Jim Ruddy. His final cryptic advice was for me to watch the video “Happy in Astana” as, according to Ruddy “back in 1917, Kabul [Afghanistan] was the same as Astana or Almaty [Kazakhstan] – 75 years of Russian rule achieved something Western rule did not.”

Being all too familiar with the chaos, violence and insecurity of Kabul – I made a total of 6 unembedded reporting trips into Afghanistan between 2007 and 2013 – I was naturally intrigued to put Ruddy’s comparative observation to the test when I visited both Astana and Almaty.

Immediately upon arrival in Kazakhstan it becomes apparent that while Afghanistan is geographically in the same Central Asian region, these two countries are worlds apart in terms of security, economy and development.

Astana was declared the new capital in 1997 and in just 20 short years, what was formerly a small market town in the rolling Steppes has become an almost futuristic, custom designed showcase with a population of nearly 1,000,000.

While many of Kazakhstan's military aircraft date back to the pre-1991 soviet era, they also possess state-of-the-art equipment like this mi-35 helicopter gunship

While many of Kazakhstan's military aircraft date back to the pre-1991 soviet era, they also possess state-of-the-art equipment like this mi-35 helicopter gunship

Equally impressive were the tree-lined boulevards of former capital Almaty, which are more reminiscent of Eastern Europe than the filthy traffic jammed third world streets of Afghanistan.

In terms of economy Kazakhstan is a dynamic success story. Although blessed with abundant natural resources including vast oil and gas deposits, at the time of the Soviet Union’s dissolution, Kazakhstan ranked 13th out of the 15 newly independent states within that former Soviet bloc. Today the Kazakh economy ranks second among that group, with only Russia itself posting a stronger GDP.

Admittedly Kazakhstan is not a western style democracy and it has been firmly ruled over by President Nursultan Nazarbayev since it became independent in December 1991. The strength of the Kazakh economy and relative security should serve to remind us that democracy is but one form of government, which, given the catastrophic results of the West’s attempts to impose democracy in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya – is clearly not successful in all cultures.

Nominally Kazakhstan is a Muslim country with the Kazakh ethnic majority identifying with that religion. While there have been a number of sizeable, landmark mosques built since 1992, both the historical nomadic nature of the Kazakh people and the decades long Soviet suppression of religion has secularized the population.

Like Canada, Kazakhstan is officially bilingual with Kazakh being the primary state language and Russian being the Lingua Franca enabling communication between the ethnic Russian and other minority groups in Kazakhstan.

Geo-strategically Kazakhstan finds itself lodged between two superpowers: China to the east, Russia to the north. Below their southern border lies Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and further, Tajikistan, and of course Afghanistan.

The Kazakh Airforce has a total of 76 combat fighter jets including the sophisticated Sukhoi Su-30sm. They are expected to acquire up to 30 of these fourth generation jets by 2020

The Kazakh Airforce has a total of 76 combat fighter jets including the sophisticated Sukhoi Su-30sm. They are expected to acquire up to 30 of these fourth generation jets by 2020

Canada by comparison has only one land border and that being with the U.S., means we have limited independent latitude in determining our Defence and Foreign policies. For the Kazakhs, they have two giants to appease, not to mention a potential vipers' nest of insecurity to their south.

The primary focus of my trip to Kazakhstan was the Eurasian Media Forum conference – which included a panel on the Syrian Peace Talks that are currently taking place in Astana. From the beginning of 2017, six rounds of talks were hosted by Astana resulting, among others, in the establishment of a final de-escalation zone in Syria’s northwestern Idlib province. 

I was also curious to get a perspective on the Kazakh Defence Policy and the reformation of their military in the post-Soviet era.

To accommodate my request the Kazakh Foreign Ministry arranged an interview with Rear-Admiral Kairgeldy Yesseneyev at the world class War Museum in Astana. Yesseneyev had been an officer in the Soviet Navy at the time of that empire’s collapse, so he had a very personal perspective of how a new Kazakh Army, Navy, and Air force were born out of the ashes of the Soviet Union.

Although the majority of their weaponry is either former soviet or Russian manufacture, Kazakhstan has begun acquiring a lot of material - such as this U.S Humvee and drone from NATO countries

Although the majority of their weaponry is either former soviet or Russian manufacture, Kazakhstan has begun acquiring a lot of material - such as this U.S Humvee and drone from NATO countries

“Over the past twenty-six years a tremendous amount of work has gone into creating combat capable Armed Forces and the main stages of that reform have been passed,” explained Yesseneyev “However the process of rebuilding is not complete. Further development of the Armed forces will focus on both national security and the capability to contribute to regional and global security.”

One of the most important first steps that Kazakhstan took upon achieving independence was to officially renounce nuclear weapons. A large portion of the Soviet nuclear missile arsenal had been situated in Kazakhstan prior to 1992. Kazakhstan has also shut down the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site where over 450 nuclear tests were conducted during the Soviet time. Renouncing these weapons was “an important step in the manifestation of goodwill and readiness to join the process of peaceful construction of an international society” said Yesseneyev.

The US State Secretary Rex Tillerson mentioned this remarkable contribution to international security during the recent UN Security Council session on nuclear non-proliferation in New York (https://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2017/09/274362.htm). Kazakhstan, by the way, has become the first ever Central Asian state to hold a non-permanent seat at the UN SC since January 2017.

In terms of conventional weaponry however, the Kazakhs were able to inherit the equipment, vehicles and aircraft of the former Soviet Armed Forces Turkestan Military District.

However, simply having tanks and planes does not create a new structure or doctrine which would reflect Kazakhstan’s new stature as an independent country – rather than a satellite within the Soviet Union. “The most difficult challenge in this process was the transition of a mass army in corps and divisions being reduced to a small but well equipped, combat capable Armed Forces,” said Yesseneyev.

As President, Nursultan Nazarbayev is also Head of State, and the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. Under Nazarbayev’s direction, in 1993 the first independent Kazakh Defence Policy resolved that the military would have a strictly defensive role.

The Kazakh Armed Forces total approximately 37,000 personnel of which 20,000 are in the army, 12,000 in the Air force, 3,000 in the Navy and another 4000 considered headquarters staff.

In addition to purchasing NATO equipement, Kazakhstan has also acquired weaponry from non-aligned countries such as this Marauder armoured vehicle from South Africa.

In addition to purchasing NATO equipement, Kazakhstan has also acquired weaponry from non-aligned countries such as this Marauder armoured vehicle from South Africa.

While the country still has a policy of conscripted service, roughly 70% of the enlisted personnel are professional volunteers and 82% of the officer corps are regular force career soldiers. There are few exemptions from this obligatory service, should your name be selected, however the policy is not unpopular in Kazakhstan.

“Given the high prestige of military service, there are no problems with conscription” said Yesseneyev “The number of those wishing to serve far exceeds the number of available positions.”

In terms of defence spending Kazakhstan would be a shirker according to Donald Trump’s 2% of GDP formula, as they only spend roughly $2 billion Canadian annually. This amounts to about 1.1% of Kazakhstan’s GDP, which is roughly the same percentage that Canada currently spends.

That said, it is amazing what the Kazakhs can field in terms of equipment on that tiny budget. For example, the Kazakhs have a fleet of 300 T-72 main battle tanks and an additional 1,000 armoured personnel carriers and patrol vehicles (Canada’s Army currently has just 40 main battle tanks). In terms of artillery they possess over 1,000 frontline guns and mortars ranging from 120mm mortars to 152mm howitzers.

The air force possesses 76 combat fighter aircraft (Canada currently has just 77 CF-18 Hornets) and 64 combat helicopters including 18 of the mi-24 Hind attack gunships. The tiny navy has only an assortment of fast patrol boats, but Kazakhstan’s maritime responsibility is only a small coastline on the landlocked Caspian Sea.

Training and education is a cornerstone of the Kazakh Armed Forces and this is something into which they invest heavily. The Cadet Corps is essentially a non-commissioned officer school, that has to date produced over 2,700 professional senior NCO’s, on a par with any top military organization.

There is also the Military Institute of the Land Force through which more than 70% of the officer corps has graduated – including 67 current serving General Officers. Specialized training is conducted at the Military Engineering’s Institute of Radio Electronics and Communication and for Air Force personnel there is the Military Institute of the Air Defence Forces.

To boost the recruiting of females, the Kazakh military staged an online beauty contest wherein viewers could vote for the most attractive female soldier.

To boost the recruiting of females, the Kazakh military staged an online beauty contest wherein viewers could vote for the most attractive female soldier.

A unique initiative undertaken by Supreme Commander Nazarbayev was the National Defence University, which has since been named in his honour. The level of instruction offered at this institute is accepted at the Oxford community and the Eurasian Association of Universities.

In addition to foreign military officers attending the Nazarbayev Military University, Kazakhstan annually sends around 400 officers on exchange to international universities in Russia, China and the U.S.A.

As a people, the Kazakhs have a military lineage dating back to the Mongol hordes of Ghengis Khan. However, as beautifully illustrated by the images and artifacts at the Astana War Museum, their modern history was that of a vassal state to Tsarist Russia or as a component of the Soviet Union.

One large mural in the World War 2 section proudly depicts a Kazakh soldier planting the Soviet flag atop the Reichstag following the surrender of Berlin in May 1945. Their participation in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War against Hitler’s Nazis is a source of great national pride.

In 2013 independent Kazakhstan staged a full-scale military parade which included an array of modern equipment. That ceremony on 7 May was to commemorate the first Declaration of the Defender Of The Fatherland national holiday. This is now an annual event.

Last year Kazakhstan garnered international media coverage when they took the unusual recruiting strategy of staging an online beauty pageant. They took photos of the most attractive Kazakh female soldiers, posted them on an official website and encouraged viewers to vote for the most attractive.

At the Astana war museum, a giant moral proudly depicts the Kazakh soldier who placed the Soviet flag atop the German Reichstag during the Battle of Berlin, May 1945

At the Astana war museum, a giant moral proudly depicts the Kazakh soldier who placed the Soviet flag atop the German Reichstag during the Battle of Berlin, May 1945

The premise was that if young Kazakh girls could see how attractive and professional the female soldiers are, they too would wish to enlist. No one could comment on whether or not the initiative was successful.

In terms of their equipment, the Kazakhstan Armed Forces still field an arsenal that was largely either inherited from the Soviets or is imported from Russia. However in recent years they have begun purchasing weaponry and vehicles from NATO members such as the U.S., Turkey, Czech Republic, Greece, France, Spain, Italy, UK, Netherlands and Germany, as well as non-aligned foreign countries like Israel and South Africa.

Kazakhstan also has an extensive home grown defence industry, which is largely a legacy of World War 2 Soviet emergency relocations.

As The Germans advanced into the Soviet Union in 1941, one of the most strategic successes was the Soviet ability to uproot their factories and relocate them out of Nazi range beyond the Ural Mountains.

As such, Kazakhstan ­­– a landlocked nation became the major supplier of naval weaponry for the Soviet Union. Following the war, the machinery remained in Kazakhstan and to this day they continue to produce state of the art exports to the Russian Navy.

In recent years, Kazakhstan’s military industry has been promoting international partnership. Canadian technology, for instance, is used in the country’s first cartridge-manufacturing plant opened in 2016 in Karaganda. (https://astanatimes.com/2016/03/countrys-first-ammunition-factory-launches-operations/). 

Canada and Kazakhstan may be halfway around the world from each other, but in many ways we are far closer than one may first think. We share large landmasses with relatively small populations, we are both rich in oil, gas and minerals.

In a central park in the city of Almaty, there is a monument dedicated to the more than 500 Kazakhs who died in Afghanistan fighting for the Soviet Union.

In a central park in the city of Almaty, there is a monument dedicated to the more than 500 Kazakhs who died in Afghanistan fighting for the Soviet Union.

Geographically and climatically, Kazakhstan is akin to the western prairies up to and including the foothills of the Rocky Mountains. We both have super-powers for neighbours, and we are both bilingual nations, albeit none of the four primary languages overlap.

There are numerous opportunities for increased trade and cooperation between Canada and Kazakhstan. One unique connection is that Canadian cattle from Saskatchewan and Alberta have proven to be adaptable to the Kazakh steppes whereas European cattle breeds have succumbed to the extreme winter cold.

We also now have a shared battlefield and a common loss with the Kazakh military as both our nations have sent soldiers into Afghanistan. In the city centre of Almaty there is a sombre monument dedicated to the more than 500 Kazakh soldiers who died there while fighting for the Soviet Union. The National War Memorial in Ottawa now pays tribute to the 158 Canadian soldiers who made the ultimate sacrifice in Afghanistan.

Kazakhstan is not so distant after all.

The author wishes to thank the Kazakhstan Foreign Ministry and Rear-Admiral Kairgeldy Yesseneyev for their hospitality and assistance during the visit to Kazakhstan.

"all data on military personnel and equipment are from open sources".

Royal Canadian Military Institute: A Landmark Renovation

Artist's rendering of the newly designed and built Royal Canadian Military Institute. (Residences at RCMI).

Artist's rendering of the newly designed and built Royal Canadian Military Institute. (Residences at RCMI).

By Scott Taylor

As a young student at the Ontario College of Art in Toronto, I would frequently trudge past the stately old mansion on University Avenue as I transited between campuses. Squashed in between towering skyscrapers, bedecked with a canvas canopy entrance and guarded by two field cannons one could not help but think that the Royal Canadian Military Institute was an out of place throwback to a previous era, smack in the middle of a modern Canadian city.

It was a decade later as the publisher of the newly founded Esprit de Corps magazine that I would first climb the carpeted stairs and enter into the hallowed halls of the RCMI. Being a lifetime student of military history, I found the RCMI to be a veritable treasure trove of books, artifacts, weapons and artwork. It was a combination of a fine gentleman’s club – complete with overstuffed leather chairs and fireplaces and a miniature war museum. The two-storey library with a collection of over 15,000 titles on military related subjects was an invaluable research resource. I became a non-resident member and the RCMI became a regular port-of-call during my numerous business trips to Toronto.

In the late 1990’s we hosted book launches at the RCMI as it could not be a more perfect setting combining military and academia. Thus it was with more than passing interest that I followed the bold plans and developments which led to the recent complete renovation and resurrection of this venerable old Institute.

The origins of the RCMI date back to 1878 and the short-lived organization known as the Militia Institute. This has been the brainchild of Sir William Otter, then a Lieutenant-Colonel who went on to earn fame and promotion in the South African war, retiring as a General with a knighthood. When the Militia Institute dissolved, Otter persisted in continuing its ideals by founding the Canadian Military Institute in 1890. It was not until 1946 that the distinguished prefix “Royal” was granted by King George VI. Throughout its 125 year history the RCMI has remained a collective think tank for Toronto based military officers and academics studying developments on the modern battlefield.

During the 1990’s, the RCMI was the spawning ground for a group named known as Reserves 2000 which remains a robust advocacy voice for increased effectiveness of Canada’s citizen soldiers. However, by 2008 the RCMI was fast approaching a critical crossroad. With club membership hovering around 1500, the RCMI was operating in the black, but only by a narrow margin. The mansion remained stately, but it was in need of millions of dollars’ worth of reconstruction – millions of dollars which the RCMI did not have. The refitting that was required was neither cosmetic, nor optional: the RCMI was rife with termites.

Desperate times call for desperate measures, and two long-time RCMI members hatched a bold plan to ‘destroy the Institute, in order to save the Institute’. Jointly, Honourary Colonels Peter Hunter and Jeff Dorfman proposed selling the property to a developer in order to construct a major condominium tower. The mansion sat atop prime real estate in Toronto’s downtown core and as a result RCMI could demand fair value in return. Tribute was the selected developer and the premise was to tear down all but the front façade, dig a solid foundation and erect a 42-storey skyscraper. While the construction was underway, RCMI members were allowed to use the facilities at the nearby Albany club, and such Institute activities such as speaker nights and dinner events were also conducted there. However, there is always an inherent risk in even partially suspending an Institute’s operations, and people being creatures of habit would be apt to make a new habit during any lengthy suspension of their usual routine. In the end, that gamble paid off as the Hunter Dorfman Institute has now resulted in an unqualified success story. Sadly, Hunter passed away in June 2009 shortly after he got the ball rolling on this project, and Dorfman never got to see the final product as he too passed September 2, 2014.

While the new and improved RCMI is already very much open for business, the official grand re-opening ceremony is not scheduled until later this summer. “We are still finding our way,” explained RCMI President Gil Taylor, “our plan is to run the operations to smooth out any kinks before the official opening.” Under the terms of the contract with Tribute, in exchange for the property, RCMI owns the bottom six floors of the new building. The total value of this is estimated at between $15-16 million, and the intention as to keep as much of the original mansion’s ambience as possible.

I toured the new premises on Monday, March 2 and I must admit the designers and contractors have done a fantastic job of blending the old and the new. Working our way down from the top, the 6th floor contains very impressive accommodations. There are a total of 9 rooms and suites, and all of them would be equal to the best 5-star hotels. The old mansion had a total of 6 rooms available to members, but these were primitive small nooks, with single beds and antiquated washbasins. Even at the discounted member prices, not many guests stayed at the old RCMI. However, I fear that once word gets out about the new facility, there will be a lengthy waiting list for overnight stays. The fifth floor contains a state of the art fitness centre, with a wide array of equipment and an excellent view out onto University Avenue. Below the gym is the RCMI’s piece du resistance – its world-renowned library.

On the third floor is the long bar – complete with the cockpit seat taken from the Red Baron’s downed Fokker Triplane, the short bar and the main dining room. The second floor contains meeting rooms, the administrative offices and a lounge replete with a full array of military miniatures in display cases. The ground floor entrance is primarily for reception/security but even the main foyer contains displays of historical military memorabilia.

In its past incarnation, the RCMI was one of the last bastions of a strictly enforced proper dress code. Even breakfast guests required jacket and tie, and if without, would be provided such items from a collection stored at the reception area. “Things are a little more casual now,” explained President Taylor, “We have to bend a little with the times.” Hotel guests heading to breakfast for instance may get away with a polo shirt and dress slacks. “Jeans are still strictly forbidden,” clarified Taylor. As for the risk of losing membership during the suspension, it would appear that the lure of the excellent new facility has nullified that. The RCMI – despite not being ‘officially’ re-opened already has more members than when they entered into the reconstruction process.

Of course an Institute is far more than just bricks and mortar and the RCMI remains focussed on its primary objective of stimulating educated debate on Canadian defence issues. In addition to hosting speaker events, the RCMI publishes its own periodical called SitRep, and the produce op-ed pieces for the mainstream media.