Operation Athena, 2009, Part 3:

By Corey Pembleton

Whether a fighter or a civilian bystander, everyone involved in war undergoes mental and emotional changes. These changes cause reactions in us that are largely inexplicable, and since the First World War we’ve been trying to understand how these changes impact societies and individuals alike. Modern science uses post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or ‘shell shock’ to label this kind of extreme mental shift that occurs following sometimes dramatic, violent events.

While PTSD is a subject I (thankfully) have neither the experience nor expertise to comment on comfortably, it is very real and highly contentious. I know men who suffer from it, and I have seen first-hand its impact on families and communities. Instead, I have chosen to conclude this three-part series on my experiences returning to Canada from Afghanistan, and reintegrating into Canadian society from a brief, three-year military life.

As mentioned, experiences in war bring on mental, emotional, or physical change, and perhaps all three to some degree — and I am certainly no exception. There are two stages of mental health assessment for Canadians returning home from Afghanistan (at least in my case). First, a short ‘cool-down’ week-long break in a resort in Cyprus, and second, an evaluation in Canada. These assessments teach us that the symptoms of mental health deterioration aren’t immediate, and that they begin to show over the weeks and months after returning home.

Statistically, not many Canadians have been to Afghanistan with the Canadian Armed Forces, and even fewer served in front-line combat positions. Upon returning to Canada, what it means to be one of those few started to come to light. This means that if the topic of Afghanistan or war arises, I am evidently the only person most have met who has been in such a position and it is largely a taboo topic. Either I get some insensitive questions asked — “Did any of your friends die?” or “Did you kill someone?” — or I get a general look of derision based on this choice, an assumption of my likely mental instability. Perhaps by explaining what mental changes I went through, this taboo can be lightened, and people with similar experiences can find some consolation that change is likely.

Introspection isn’t, or rather wasn’t, a strong suit of mine during the years immediately upon my return to Canada. Most of what I now know about my actions after coming home I learned years after the fact. Becoming more self-aware has taught me that I was short-tempered, prone to seclusion, drinking heavily, and pushing my loved ones away. I would say this is common behaviour for returning soldiers, and is highly reflective of the behaviour of people suffering from chronic depression. Undoubtedly, these behavioural changes hit some of us harder than others, and in my experience the difference between getting better is the degree to which a support system is in place from family, friends, and comrades.

I was lucky enough to have a strong system in place. They tolerated my short temper, pointed out my increasingly reclusive behaviours and gave me the silent help that comes without words, because often there aren’t any words to be said. I pushed them away when the topic of Afghanistan came up and they continued to patiently support me. I can say, and not too dramatically either, that the outcome of my return would have been far more turbulent without their support.

Nine months after returning from Afghanistan (and serving under an excellent sergeant-major during this time), I was honourably discharged as a corporal in the Royal Canadian Dragoons, received my pension cheque, and at 22 was set loose again into society, hopeful of being accepted into university, nervous of failure.

Waiting for the results from my university application I picked up a construction job building a bowling alley, largely unable to accept the fact that less than a year ago I was performing reconnaissance on high-value targets in one of the most dangerous places in the world. Upon entering school this perspective was amplified; my past was guiding my perceptions of everyone and everything. The shift from the conservative, dictatorial world of the military to the liberal, inclusion-focused university world was slow and harsh. I was told I simply can’t compare my experiences to things I would encounter in Canada, and very quickly I learned not to mention the military and especially not my involvement in the war in Afghanistan. Compared to those in the army, civilians are patient, quiet and generally agreeable; almost the opposite for how one needs to act in a combat arms unit. Staying silent became my standard approach to reintegration.

 It wasn’t until after two or three years in school before I could comfortably say I fit into civilian society again, could speak about the war with some objectivity, and reflect on what the mission meant to me personally and politically. This would mean a 1:1 ratio for years served and years taken to reintegrate. By no means is this a standard; maybe some soldiers need very little time to reintegrate (although I find that unlikely), perhaps some never integrate back into civilian life. The transition to becoming a functioning member of society again is long and ongoing, and the costs to individuals and communities remain heavy and largely unknown. I now teach students who are too young to remember the war, a population that will only increase with the passage of time.

I get asked if going to Afghanistan was worth it, whether I would go again. I learned invaluable lessons working with the Afghan people, and that while historically there have always been those ideologically posed towards death and destruction, humans are still beautiful and worth protecting. Often we perceive ourselves to be on the winning side, the side of righteousness and fairness. While I’m unsure of whether I believe that to be true, I do believe all humans deserve a chance at prosperity and fulfilling their dreams, and as a species I believe we owe it to ourselves to protect that chance when someone attempts to remove it through inequality, terrorism or any other injustice. I would go again in a heartbeat.

Operation Athena, 2009, Part 2: The Panjwa'i District

By Corey Pembleton

I’m leaving Canada for the first time in my life and I’m on a flight to a war zone in Afghanistan. What the hell am I thinking? I am not fully cognizant of reality and feeling tense. I know the look on my face is betraying my attempt to appear collected and calm.

The goal of this post is to provide a reflection of the events that occurred during my eight-month tour. My hope is that this will help other Canadians understand the feelings and experiences of one of their compatriots who fought in this war. Please remember: these are a reflection of my thoughts and feelings alone, and may not reflect those of my past colleagues or of the Canadian Armed Forces. I don’t intend to glorify or detract from the war or my experiences in the process; it just is what it is.

Upon arrival we are flown on a helicopter to where we will be replacing the current armoured reconnaissance squadron, the 12e Régiment blindé du Canada. My squadron, B Squadron of the Royal Canadian Dragoons, is to be situated between three locations in a hostile area sandwiched between a desert to the south and a river valley to the north, impassable at most locations.

The first several weeks are an adrenaline-fuelled blur, with the excitement of the tasks overpowering the fear of dying. I see my first improvised explosive device (IED) strike less than 300 metres outside our camp, injuring a driver. The driver was airlifted out but only suffered minor injuries and was returned to duty in less than a month.

Sometime soon after, perhaps several days or maybe even several weeks as the days tended to blur together, we are driving down the same road. This road is a major chokepoint with no possible way around. I was in the surveillance operator position, half-standing out of a hatch looking over the vehicles’ rear with a large transportation truck following behind us. Suddenly, the transport truck has an IED explode under its front wheels.

I feel the percussion of the blast against my body, and my heart, brain and hands quickly begin operating in survival mode. But my training takes over and without thinking, I begin to I carry out my drills. I dismount and begin searching nearby homes with some other guys from my squadron. This is the first time I had that intense feeling of adrenaline and madness flow through my blood that I believe can only be found in war. From that day forward and for the next eight months, that intense adrenaline rush never really subsided every time we went on patrol.

Over the next several months, attacks on our troops intensify, mostly in the Panjwa’i District outside of Nakahonay where we are working. Our main tasks are performing route clearances and support for infantry units with surveillance equipment as well as patrolling in small villages nearby. The randomness and lethality of the attacks on vehicles and foot patrols make it difficult to understand the meaning behind it all. You rarely see the enemy you are supposed to be fighting.

In December, one of the largest and most complex IEDs we encountered kills four Canadian soldiers and a journalist along the route we take regularly. How can you make sense of such senseless death? This is the absurdity of life and the confusion of death that dictates our every action. We find out in January that our tour will be extended by two months and we won’t see Canada again until June. While the chance to make a little extra money is nice, getting killed in that period definitely wouldn’t be.

Thankfully, as our tour progresses, the attacks in our most immediate area subside, although in nearby Nakahonay they continue with full lethality. What I experienced could be considered a calm tour compared to previous ones, and I feel that the maturation of the war and the Canadian presence over the years had a lot to do with it. At least in the villages we are based out of, our Canadian Armed Forces made positive inroads with the locals and are viewed favourably.

During our tour, we are continually improving our relationship with local village leaders, providing funding through Civil-Military Cooperation (CIMIC) missions for local development projects entirely carried out by Afghans. I can recall an open-sewage system and a flood barrier being constructed in a nearby village; as well as workshops on democratic reform and improved farming techniques in the district centre.

We have time to get into a routine based out of our small mud-walled compound, kept interesting with unique tasks leading patrols for various reasons. Overtime, the locals in our area become more comfortable with our presence and some reach out to us for help against the Taliban. Other patrols aren’t as fortunate and are on long-term road surveillance tasks in Panjwa’i, boring but vital work, which keeps them without fresh meals for weeks on end. Our tour ends in June with no fatalities from my regiment, the first time in my regiment’s history of deployment in Southern Afghanistan.

Reflection on both the positive and negative experiences that occurred during this time is often chronological and factual, rarely is it a time for critical reflection of how I felt during those months. I feel that most soldiers would agree that getting into dangerous situations is what we signed up for and wanted to experience, so when we get into them it isn’t necessarily as much of an unimaginable or frightening experience, as many civilians would think. However, there is generally a disconnect between our experiences on the battlefield and how the general public understands these experiences.

An important aspect of telling these kinds of stories of events is in how they are critically assessed and understood at the personal level, not only for myself but for those listening to my story and that of others. This becomes more difficult as soldiers transition home after serving overseas. In an effort to bridge this gap, the third and final blog in this series on my experiences in Afghanistan will look at the return home and my re-integration into civilian life.

Preparing for Operation Athena, 2009: Part 1

By Corey Pembleton

The young clerk sits me down in the waiting room, its walls covered in posters and pamphlets. Across the room a mother and her son half nervously and half excitedly discuss something they’re reading. After waiting six months for my records to clear I’m finally here, waiting for the offer.

I get called into the office and the burly artillery officer tells me bluntly that because I’m colour blind, nearly every choice of trade is off the table except the infantry or armoured. He recommends armour because infantry is back-breaking work and he probably didn’t think my scrawny frame could handle it. I quickly agree with him and sign the stack of papers to enlist in the Armour Corps.

This is how I joined the military in 2008. The more difficult and most frequently asked question is why I joined. When I signed that piece of paper, I had no idea what the armour corps was (are there tanks in Canada?) and definitely had no idea what I would be doing: I just knew I wanted to get that tan uniform on and go to Afghanistan.

When I graduated high school in 2006, almost every day the cover of the newspaper featured portraits of men and women killed in Afghanistan. This bothered me. It bothered me that they were fighting and dying, while I was living in comfort and safety in Canada. This might be misconstrued for blind jingoism, but it’s far from it. I believe that there are some ideas worth dying for, even if I don’t fully understand what those ideas mean.

Philosopher Albert Camus writes that no one has died for an ontological argument, but plenty of people are willing to die for an idea (or illusion) that gives a reason for living. At the age of 20 I felt (and still feel) that there are endless things worth living and dying for. There are complex and well-articulated arguments and philosophical treatises regarding justice and reasoning for war, but to my 20-year-old self the reason was far simpler: that the idea of justice is worth dying for, fuelled by a keen thirst for adventure. An answer too simple for even myself to accept now, seven years later.

Following basic training, I was told I would be going to Petawawa to join the Royal Canadian Dragoons, a regiment within the Royal Canadian Armour Corps or Calvary. Historically, the roles of each regiment have shifted, but normally they are comprised of two aspects: heavy or light armoured squadrons. I was assigned to B (not ‘bravo’) Squadron, a light armour squadron that performs reconnaissance and scouting tasks. Scouting is a high-speed role in which specialized small units gain information on terrain and enemies prior to the main force. To perform this task, we use light armoured vehicles called Coyotes that are equipped with a 25mm chain gun and two 7.66mm machine guns. These vehicles are able to hold four crewmembers: a driver, surveillance operator, gunner and crew commander. Being the newest recruit to the squadron, I would become either a driver or a surveillance operator, depending on my performance during training and need.

Training for war is a process designed to determine if soldiers are physically, mentally and emotionally capable of performing under high levels of stress for extended periods of time. Most Canadian soldiers would normally receive brief training of six months before being sent off. We were lucky to have almost a full year including two six-week exercises of ‘operations-style’ training in Alberta — a measure of how soldiers cope with distance from loved ones and how well they can do their jobs in unfamiliar territory. Only about two thirds of those training with the Dragoons would be given a highly coveted position to deploy. I was selected to drive for 63D (delta), the most junior of eight vehicles, and one of the most dangerous (and most expendable) positions to be in, as we would be tasked with leading patrols, although the difference between other vehicles’ danger levels is probably only marginal at best.

Our squadron was also responsible for repatriating members of our unit who were killed in action. I had the honour of attending in parade the repatriation of Trooper Brian Good, who was killed in Afghanistan in January 2009 while serving with D Squadron. Although our deployment was still nine months away, this experience made me acutely aware of the reality of what deployment truly meant. Other men in my regiment had multiple tours under their belts, with many having served in the early combat tours in 2006 and 2007 in Kandahar; they had no illusions about what we were heading into.

In the weeks leading up to deployment the realization that death was possible, perhaps even likely, began entering my mind in a subliminal way. Most families who had a spouse in the unit but no other reason to be there headed out of Petawawa. We began storing our cars, packing up our lives, and saying goodbye to our families. When I said goodbye to my mom, she did not believe me when I told her I wouldn’t be in a fatal situation. My row house became a boarding house, with five men sleeping on couches and mattresses in the last week. Everyone was a little nervous but all of us laughed, all the time. Laughter and jokes became our strongest defence against reality.

On the first of October 2009, still drunk from the night before, we made our way to the bus that would take us to the airport where our transport to Afghanistan awaited us. A buddy of mine, who fought in 2007 and was going on his second tour, had a friend from his first tour seeing him off. The three of us were making small talk and joking while waiting to board when he casually asked me what my position was. I replied 63D driver. With that he stopped laughing, asked my full name, and with a firm handshake looked me in the eye and said, “Have a safe tour man.”

My buddy told me on the bus that his friend had told him that 63D drivers don’t usually make it home.