Invisible No More: June 12 Becomes a Turning Point for Women Veteran Advocacy

Mount Saint Vincent University

Question:

Why should June 12 matter to all Veterans, and what’s the new ‘Invisible No More’ project all about?

Answer:

Do you think Veteran support systems work equally well for everyone?

If you said yes, think again. Many Veterans struggle with the current government support system. A common complaint is that it’s overly bureaucratic, with often overwhelming paperwork demands, rather than being focused on meeting Veterans where they are and helping them heal. Women Veterans face all the same bureaucratic challenges as other Veterans, while also often encountering additional barriers related to their sex and gender.

Why June 12 Matters

On June 12, 2024, the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs (ACVA) tabled its landmark Invisible No More. The Experiences of Canadian Women Veterans report. Its 42 recommendations aimed to address many gaps identified in areas such as women-specific research, health care, peer support, benefits, services, and recognition.

The ACVA Report: Exposing Hard Truths

The ACVA report exposed hard truths. Many of the testimonies were raw and impossible to ignore. One Veteran described years of untreated injuries from a brutal sexual assault during basic training, ultimately leading to homelessness. Others recounted fighting to access essential women’s health care, navigating male-normed systems designed primarily for men, and facing medical releases that didn’t reflect their sex- and gender-specific transition needs. Many women Veterans balance societal expectations as unpaid caregivers while lacking adequate support for their own well-being. Unfortunately, these types of powerful testimonies were not isolated. Dozens of women Veterans reported their experiences with systemic support failures across current government systems.

The ACVA report’s recommendations included concrete steps forward: more research, data collection on sex and gender differences, trauma-informed care, women-specific health and transition support, targeted housing and income aid, and formal recognition—including a government apology for systemic failures faced by women Veterans. But identifying problems and issuing recommendations is only the beginning—implementation is the real challenge.

The Invisible No More Project

On June 12, 2025, Parliament will mark the first anniversary of the ACVA report to celebrate progress and highlight ongoing work. To help turn the ACVA recommendations into reality, the federally funded Invisible No More: Canadian Women Veterans Moving the ACVA Report Recommendations to Full Implementation project is building momentum.

Led by Dr. Maya Eichler, Director of the Centre for Social Innovation and Community Engagement in Military Affairs (SICEMA) at Mount Saint Vincent University in Halifax, and supported by many Veteran research partners, including Dr. Karen Breeck and Dr. Nancy Taber, this multi-year initiative aims to formalize best practices for research involving women Veterans.

As women Veterans begin to be seen and recognized as a distinct community, they are no longer willing to be passive research subjects—they want to be equal partners, as captured by the rallying cry:  #NothingAboutUsWithoutUs.

Using a trauma-sensitive, culturally responsive approach, the ‘Invisible No More’ project seeks to drive the ACVA recommendations into action. Upcoming milestones include interviews, public engagement sessions, writing workshops, and the development of new policy tools. Over the next year, the research team will gather input from women Veterans across Canada to help define what successful implementation of the recommendations looks like from their perspective.

A Call to Action

On June 12, 2026, the second anniversary of the ACVA report’s tabling, the ‘Invisible No More’ project plans to release its first public ‘Report Card,’ grading the government’s progress to date.
The nearly 100,000 Canadian military and RCMP women—serving and retired—deserve systems that honour their contributions and address their unique challenges.

Inclusive, Veteran-centric systems won’t just benefit women—they’ll strengthen the entire defence community and Canadian society. This isn’t about anyone asking for special treatment. It’s about fairness. No one who wore the uniform and now lives with service-related injuries or illnesses should be left behind.

If you served in the military or RCMP—or care about someone who did—the June 12 date and the ‘Invisible No More’ project should matter to you. For policymakers, community leaders, and all Canadians, supporting these changes strengthens our nation’s commitment to those who serve.

June 12 is no longer just a date. It’s a promise to Canada’s Veterans that government must keep. Visit www.MSVU.ca/InvisibleNoMore to learn more or get involved.
                                                #InvisibleNoMore #PlusJamaisInvisibles

Restorative Engagement: One Path Toward Culture Change in the CAF–DND

Photo Credit Government of Canada.

Content Warning: This article discusses sexual misconduct and the Canadian Armed Forces–Department of National Defence (CAF–DND) class action lawsuit, which may be distressing for some readers.

Question:

What should readers know about the Restorative Engagement Program, enrolled by 6,403 class members of the 2019 CAF–DND Sexual Misconduct Class Action Lawsuit?

Answer:

On November 25, 2019, the Federal Court approved a $900 million settlement as part of the Final Settlement Agreement (FSA) for the CAF–DND Sexual Misconduct Class Action which ended up paying out on nearly 24,000 claims. While the financial award amount drew headlines, the FSA’s Restorative Engagement Program was equally, if not more, significant. This program offers enrolled members a structured path not only toward individual healing but also toward influencing lasting changes in military culture.

Program Foundations
The Restorative Engagement Program begins with the understanding that financial compensation alone will not repair all the harms experienced from sexual misconduct. Participants enter the program with varied motivations—some seek institutional accountability, others acknowledgement, and many simply want their voices heard. Each participant collaborates one-on-one with trauma-aware Restorative Practitioners from the Sexual Misconduct Support and Resource Centre (SMSRC). Together they co-design a safe, flexible process for the participant to share their personal experiences with the CAF–DND Defence Representatives—volunteer leaders who absorb the insights and translate them into real-world workplace culture shifts. Unlike criminal restorative justice programs, this program excludes perpetrators entirely, focusing solely on the participant.

Program Progress and Challenges
According to SMSRC reports as of April 2025, fewer than 400 of the 6,403 enrolled class members have completed their restorative engagement sessions with Defence Representatives. That participation gap reflects many factors, including shifting motivations, logistical hurdles such as scheduling and time commitment for virtual or in-person sessions, and emotional unreadiness. Some of those who have engaged describe a profound sense of validation from being heard, believed, or already seeing culture changes happening in their old/present workplaces. Others remain skeptical that the Program will result in meaningful change when so much of its success depends on Defence Representatives converting their insights into new training, accountability measures, and policy updates.

Program Participation – Decision Time 
If you’re among the many enrolled but undecided, the decision to participate is personal and depends on your needs. However, to stay enrolled in the Program you will need to confirm your interest with SMSRC by 30 September 2025. Once you confirm your interest, you will have until 31 March 2026 to complete your restorative engagement sessions.
To further explore your options, visit the SMSRC update page; book a conversation with an SMSRC Restorative Practitioner; connect with a peer who has participated; or consider other non-FSA related options that might work better for you. To opt out, simply notify SMSRC to close your file—no penalty or further contact.

Expanding the Program’s Impact
Units across the defence ecosystem are starting to integrate restorative program insights into their training and studying what, if any, culture shifts are resulting. Many other groups are exploring how similar restorative models might also become best practices for meaningfully addressing and resolving non-sexual misconduct related complaints, including workplace harassment, discrimination, and patient-care related complaints. Amplifying these lessons could transform not only CAF–DND but other federal departments dealing with institutional misconduct.

Culture Change Needs More Than One Pathway

As the Sexual Misconduct Restorative Engagement Program moves towards its end, its legacy will be measured by its impact on culture change, not its participation numbers. CAF–DND leadership must continue implementing necessary reforms and communicating transparently about the remaining FSA commitments—including a mandated independent evaluation of SMSRC’s effectiveness. 

A Collective Responsibility

While individual participation drives the Program, broader culture change requires collective action. Leadership must lead by example, but everyone in the defence community must collectively challenge misconduct in the workplace. Sexual misconduct can—and does—affect anyone. With over 40 percent of the class action claims filed by men, it is also very clearly not “just a women’s issue.”

The Restorative Engagement Program offered one concrete pathway towards culture change. Its long-term success, however, depends on all of us choosing to support leadership, speaking up against hateful or sexualized words and behaviours, and refusing to remain silent.

Culture change will require a team effort.

Governments Change–but Our Advice Stays the Same

By Military Woman

Question:

What enduring advice should the next federal government heed from Military Woman?

Answer:

Governments change, but so far, our Military Woman advice remains the same. We’ve offered our advice to new governments before (Vol 26, Issue 10 and Vol 28, Issue 9).

Let’s revisit the 2021 ‘Advice for the Next Parliament’ column and ask:

Does this advice still hold true today?

“This column was written before knowing the results of the [2021] election; however the health and welfare of military women is expected to be of continued political interest regardless of the winner. So, what general advice could we offer to the new government?

1.      Be Bold

There is still much that needs to be fixed in the military. The easy fixes have already all been made.  It will require patience and perseverance to identify and address the root causes of the military’s remaining complex intersectional problems. And, although the political focus has been largely on sexual misconduct, all forms of systemic bias and discrimination in the military must be addressed concurrently. It will take a government with vision and courage to successfully oversee and direct the needed changes in military culture. Uncomfortable conversations must still be had with Canadians, politicians, and military members alike.

2.      Talk to Canadians

For a number of diverse reasons, recruitment is likely to be challenging for the foreseeable future. This reality means the military’s sustainability will be predicated on its ability to successfully effect culture change to attract young Canadians and to clearly articulate to them for what and why they are signing up. Peacekeeping? Combat? Cyber? Domestic emergency response? Let’s reconfirm with Canadians what their military’s primary functions should be. Only then can we fully reimagine and communicate what an “ideal Canadian soldier” needs to be to make our military strong, secure, and inclusive. 

3.      Listen to Military Members

Because military members must be apolitical and non-unionized, their voices are often muted when the political level seeks their input. Politicians would therefore be wise to concurrently seek the voice of the retired/released military members and their loved ones, who are unencumbered by such limitations. Government would do well to remember that the most efficient and effective recruiters in all the world are happy healthy veterans 

4.      Do No Harm

When developing any new military program, policy or benefit follow three steps. First, apply a sex and gender-based analysis. For the military to attract and represent the diverse population it serves, inclusion and intersectionality issues must be addressed. Second, the military is, by definition, a trauma-exposed workplace. Therefore, all programs and policies applied to the military should be trauma aware and informed. Third, the military is by definition “not civilian.” Civilian decision makers must seek out and include military culture awareness, including the existence of a plethora of military sub-cultures. Missing any of these three steps makes preventable harm inequitably likely to occur to members of the non-dominant military groups such as women, Indigenous people, LGBTQ2 people and people of colour.

5.      Uphold Sexual and Reproductive Human Rights 

Many military women want to serve their country and to have a family. Because of the unique work stresses and exposures possible especially in operational military jobs and environments, every military pregnancy ideally is planned. As a military member’s medical care is a federal, not provincial, responsibility there is much that the federal government can do to ensure military women’s sexual and reproductive human rights. Our policymakers, health care providers, military members and their chain of command should be aware of the basics of how to support women’s health needs particularly on-board ship, in the field, and during deployments. All military members should be allowed to store their sperm / eggs prior to deployments as a government provided workplace benefit. All military members should be aware of what their options are after unplanned sex, regardless of where they are in the world. Day-after sex medications (Plan B) should be accessible without barriers to all members, including on ships and during deployment.

Medication abortion (Mifegymiso) should be

available including by telemedicine support when operationally so required. Margaret Atwood’s “Handmaid’s Tale” cannot be allowed to become a Texas based  documentary instead of what it is – a highly evocative and disturbing sociological commentary and warning.”

International Women’s Day: Military Women Need More Than Just One Day

Leading Seaman Justine Boivin (left) and Leading Seaman Alexy Thibault pose for a photo onboard Her Majesty’s Canadian Ship (HMCS) KINGSTON before departing Lagos, Nigeria on March 11, 2018 during Operation PROJECTION.

 Photo: Sgt Shilo Adamson, Canadian Forces Recruiting Group Headquarters, CFB Borden RG2018-0016-02

By Military Woman

Question:

What’s new for military women this International Women’s Day 2025?

Answer:

International Women’s Day (IWD) comes around every March 8, like clockwork. But let’s be honest––these events often feel like just another government checkbox exercise. A quick salute to military women’s achievements, while their real, unresolved issues stay sidelined. So, what’s different in 2025?

This year, there’s a growing push to ensure defence-related IWD events go beyond photo ops and scripted speeches. The newly formed Women Veterans Council has the potential to reshape future IWD initiatives, including the Women Veterans Forum, by shifting the focus to meaningful, Veteran-centric discussions.

The ultimate goal? How about laying the groundwork for a standalone Women Veterans Day—separate from IWD––to address the systemic gaps that IWD celebrations often overlook?

The 2025 Women Veterans Forum: Progress, But Not Enough

The 4th Annual Women Veterans Forum, held in Ottawa on March 6-7, aimed to honour women during IWD week. It was a commendable effort, but let’s be real––commemoration-focused events rarely capture or address the actual unmet needs of women Veterans.

Women Veterans are not a one-size-fits-all community. Yes, many are thriving. But others? They’re barely surviving.

Some battle PTSD, only to have their symptoms dismissed as “stress” or “anxiety” or, worse, misdiagnosed as a personality disorder by providers unfamiliar with military trauma. Others, including Indigenous women, women of colour, trans women, LGBT Purge survivors, and those with visible or invisible disabilities, face additional barriers that celebratory events will often fail to acknowledge, let alone address.

This year’s invitation-only Forum was another barrier. With just 75 in-person seats–out of a community of almost 100,000 women Veterans––virtual access was critical. Yet for many, getting access to the Forum, whether in person or online, felt as exclusive as a backstage pass to meet Prince Harry at the Invictus Games.

Put simply: More women Veterans wanted to attend the Forum than were given the chance.

If “Leaving No Veterans Behind” is more than just a slogan, it’s time to rethink how the Forum operates. The new Women Veterans Council has a real opportunity here. Setting clear, measurable objectives could help ensure the Forum drives meaningly improvements in care and support––especially for those still struggling.

One fix? Rotate Forum oversight among CAF,  RCMP, and VAC to ensure broader input and transparency.

A Big Idea: Women Veterans Day

IWD matters––but it’s about celebration. And celebration isn’t the best time for tackling serious issues. Women Veterans need more than a stack of Ministerial Commendations. They need a dedicated space to push for real, systemic change.

Here’s a game-changing idea for 2025: Keep IWD for celebrating military women’s achievements––but create a standalone Women Veterans Day.

A strong contender for the date?  June 12—the day Parliament officially accepted the 2024 “Invisible No More” report on the experiences of Canadian women Veterans.

Women Veterans Day wouldn’t just be symbolic––it could be a day of advocacy, accountability and direct engagement with Parliament. The mission? Ensure the equitable access to research, programs, services, and benefits for all Veterans, women included.

To the Military Men Reading This

Before you ask—yes, there’s an International Men’s Day (Google it, or check out Esprit de Corps Magazine, Vol. 26, Issue 2).

And no––these “women’s issues” aren’t about taking anything away from men. These issues are actually about improving our shared Veteran community.

Your sisters-in-arms took the same risks, faced the same challenges, and carry many of the same injuries and illnesses as you––plus some extra ones that you might not see.

Women Veterans are your peers, daughters, wives, mothers, and  grandmothers. Women Veterans are not asking for special treatment––just a fair shot.

Like you, women Veterans want smarter recruitment policies, stronger retention strategies, peak operational military effectiveness, and smoother post-service transitions—for everyone. Women Veterans aren’t asking for favours––just for the government to stop assuming all Veterans are men and to eliminate the systemic barriers still holding them back. 

Final Thoughts

International Women’s Day is a start—but it can’t be the end of the conversation.

Real change starts by no longer treating women Veterans as an afterthought. That means rethinking the Women Veterans Forum, pushing for a Women Veterans Day, and ensuring no Veteran—regardless of their sex or gender—is left behind.

Decision-makers: Are you listening?

New Women Veterans Council: Why It Matters

By Military Woman

Question:

What is the Women Veterans Council (WVC),  and why is it important?

Answer:

For the first time, women Veterans now have a formal, national platform to advocate for issues that uniquely affect them.

After years of advocacy, Minister Ginette Petitpas Taylor announced on December 12, 2023, the government’s intention to create a “women’s advisory ministerial committee”. A national call for applicants was held throughout June 2024. An assessment board of women Veterans finished reviewing the over 200 applications in September 2024. The minister announced December 2, 2024, the names of the twelve serving and retired CAF and RCMP women to serve on the Women Veterans Council (WVC) which had its first in-person meeting on January 29, 2025.

One Veteran, One Standard - Aren’t Veteran Issues the Same for Everyone ?

Yes and no. While many challenges are shared by all Veterans, VAC’s research, disability assessments, and benefits were originally designed with the male Veteran in mind, often overlooking the differences specific to women Veteran’s service experiences and health needs.

VAC’s  “One Veteran, One Standard” approach may sound fair, but in practice, women Veterans have been getting “added and stirred” into systems that don’t always include the research, benefits and services for their needs.

As noted by the 42 recommendations made from the report Invisible No More: Experiences of Canadian Women Veterans (tabled in parliament on June 12, 2024) –– many women Veterans’ issues continue to feel invisible within VAC and the broader society, including the Veteran community. The WVC’s mission is simple: to ensure serving and retired women Veterans (CAF and RCMP) receive equitable levels of research, benefits, and other supports compared to their male peers and civilian spouses. For example:

·       Medical Knowledge: Many VAC programs lack evidence-based research on service-related conditions that disproportionately impact women Veterans, including uterine prolapse, urinary incontinence, pregnancy complications, autoimmune disorders, musculoskeletal injuries, breast cancer, mental health conditions, and dementia.

·       Benefits and Supports: Women Veterans are less likely than men to self-identify as Veterans, apply for VAC benefits or have their claims approved. Many women Veterans don’t realize their health conditions may be service-related, while others avoid VAC due to past institutional failures that eroded their trust. Many women struggle to find Veteran culturally aware service providers, while VAC’s claim adjudicators and case managers often still are lacking in the training and tools to fairly assess women-specific service-related injury and illness.

·       Transition & Identity: Many women Veterans feel invisible as Veterans in Canadian society at large and the Veteran community in specific, worsening their risks for social isolation and discouraging them from help-seeking behaviours.

·       Misconceptions: Advocacy for women Veterans is often still misunderstood and mistakenly lumped in with related, but separate issues. Women Veteran advocacy goes beyond military sexual trauma (MST) or 2SLGBTQI+ issues, which impact all sexes and genders –– not just women.

How Can You Support Women Veterans?

If you’re wondering, “What does this have to do with me?”—the answer is simple: Identifying and rectifying women Veteran challenges will ultimately lead to better support for all Veterans. A strong, united Veteran community will benefit everyone.

In the 1970s and 80s women fought for the right to serve alongside men in all military roles and environments. In the 90s they fought through the initial waves of gender and sexual orientation integration challenges. In the 2000s they fought for workplaces free from sexual violence and for more sex-specific equipment to decrease preventable injuries. Today, women Veterans are fighting for fair treatment and recognition in their post-service lives– an effort that will strengthen the entire Veteran community.

You can help by:

·      Encouraging women Veterans to self-identify and engage with VAC, the WVC and the annual Women Veterans Forums - the next one being in Ottawa March 6-7, 2025.

·      Advocating for VAC policies to support all Veterans—including Indigenous, racialized, disabled, and women Veterans.

·      Recognizing that equity isn’t about division or competition—it’s about making sure no Veteran is left behind.

The work of the WVC will hopefully fix some of the past mistakes, while also ensuring a better future for all who are serving today and tomorrow.

When we know better—we can do better for all Veterans, together.

MAPLE MAGA: Some New Vocabulary for 2025

By Military Woman

Question:

What are some of the new terms—and new ways of using old terms—that Canadians should know about for 2025?

Answer:

In case you haven’t noticed, Trump is back. His ‘Make America Great Again’ (MAGA) 2.0 campaign promises a new ‘Golden Age’ with a sharp focus on ‘America First’ initiatives.

During Pete Hegseth’s riveting Senate confirmation hearing to become the next U.S. Secretary of Defence, it became clearer how the ‘America First’ approach might also influence Canadian politics and military culture—especially for women and 2SLGBTQI+ members of the armed forces.

To help you navigate the ever-shifting vocabulary landscape, here are 10 terms—some new and others repurposed—you might want to better understand:

1. Maple MAGA 
   The ‘sweetened’ Canadian version of the U.S. MAGA movement. Like it or not, U.S.- originated MAGA rhetoric, vocabulary, and themes are gaining traction in Canada, including within our military circles.

2. Woke
   Once used to describe someone with awareness of social inequities, ‘woke’ is now a term of ridicule. It’s often used to dismiss anyone who highlights the existence of systemic, unearned workplace and social advantages that disproportionately benefit white, heterosexual, Christian men.

3. Cancel Culture
   Once describing backlash—usually online—against regressive opinions, ‘cancel culture’ now targets those labeled as ‘woke’. Bot-driven online campaigns, often originating outside Canada, amplify our societal polarization and suppress needed critical discussions.

4. Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI)
   The Canadian version of the U.S.’s ‘Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion’ (DEI) policies. Once tied to workplace fairness policies, all these terms are now politicized. Critics claim EDI overemphasizes identity factors over merit, while advocates highlight the systemic barriers that continue to prevent some groups from receiving equal recognition of merit for equal work.

5. Freedom Convoys
   What started as a Canadian truckers’ protest against vaccine mandates grew into a global movement, including the U.S. based ‘People’s Convoy’. While the convoys championed bodily autonomy, critics highlighted their selective application of ‘my body, my choice’ supports to men while ignoring parallel calls by some women for more reproductive rights.

6. Gender Ideology
   Originally promoting equality for women and 2SLGBTQI+ people, ‘gender ideology’ is now a politically weaponized term. Policies supporting gender-neutral washrooms and pronoun use are increasingly framed as ideological battles, often fueled by misinformation designed to heighten societal divide.

7. The Great Replacement Theory
   A conspiracy theory claiming immigration policies aim to ‘replace’ native-born populations, often targeting non-white, non-Christian immigrants. This rhetoric has also been linked to criticisms against military recruitment strategies that target specific populations that are known to be underrepresented in the military.

8. Oligarchy
   Power concentrated among a small group of elites, such as unelected business CEOs. Spin-off terms like ‘Tech Oligarchs’ and ‘Broligarchs’, highlight the sudden rise in global influence of a handful of ‘Tech Bro’ industry leaders.

9. Traditional Military Ways
   This phrase often romanticizes strict gender roles, where the tradwife stays home to support their male military spouse’s career instead of pursuing their own career. For some, it’s also a coded way to resist against progress on gender and sexual orientation equality and integration within the military. 

10. Virtue Signalling
    A polarizing term used to dismiss other’s decisions as being performative. For example, a leader selecting a woman Veteran for a Remembrance Day event might be dismissed as ‘virtue signalling,’ even when the choice was merit-based.

Why Words Matter
Many of these phrases are becoming commonplace in our social media feeds and daily conversations. Understanding their evolving meanings helps us communicate more effectively and recognize quicker when language is weaponized to sow chaos, division, and distraction—often benefiting foreign actors.

What to Do with This Knowledge

Stay curious. Keep learning. By following our ever-evolving vocabulary, Canadians can better  identify disinformation, counter misinformation, and engage in respectful, meaningful non-violent dialogue with one another.

For 2025, it’s time to step out of our algorithm-driven online echo chambers and reconnect more through face-to-face conversations. By genuinely sharing and understanding each other’s lived experiences, we can begin to bridge the growing divides in Canadian families, workplaces, and communities.

Honouring the Highway of Heroes

A Highway of Heroes marker, part of Ontario’s Highway 401.  

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons, User: Floydian 

Esprit de Corps Magazine January 2025 // Volume 31 Issue 12 

Let's Talk About Women in the Military – Column 70 

By Military Woman 

Question: 

What is the significance of the Highway of Heroes, and how has it most recently been commemorated? 

Answer: 

The Highway of Heroes is a moving Canadian symbol of military sacrifice, honouring those who have fallen while in service to their nation. For decades, Canadians associated military sacrifice with World War I, World War II, and the Korean War. After Korea, Canada’s focus on peacekeeping missions led many civilians to believe that military-related deaths were a thing of the past. 

That largely held erroneous assumption was shattered during Canada’s involvement in the Afghanistan War. Starting in 2002, Canadians witnessed their fallen soldiers returning to 8 Wing, Trenton, Ontario via flag draped coffins to make their final journey along Highway 401 to the Toronto Coroner’s Office. In 2007, this specific stretch of road was officially renamed by the Government of Ontario as Highway of Heroes—in tribute to the Canadian Armed Forces members who had made the ultimate sacrifice. 

The Tree Campaign 

One local initiative set up in honour of the Highway of Heroes was the Tree Campaign, led by Mark Cullen, Tony DiGiovanni, and Michael de Pencier. Their initial goal was to plant 117,000 trees along the Highway of Heroes, to represent each of the Canadians lost in military service over the history of the nation. 

Initially backed by the Landscape Ontario’s Foundation, the campaign quickly gained momentum. Supporters included Gerry Butts, then Chief of Staff to the Prime Minister, and Seamus O’Regan, then Minister of Veterans Affairs. Financial contributions included: 

• $2 million from the Ontario Government, 

• $3 million from Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC), and 

• Several million from individual Canadians, other charities (like Forests Ontario (now Canada), GrandTrees and the Maple Leaves Forever Foundation), and corporations (like GM and SJC Media). 

This success led to the development of a new charity, Canadian Trees for Life, with Cullen, DiGiovanni, and de Pencier as its founding board members. Their combined efforts saw the Tree Tribute Campaign surpass its $10 million fundraising goal early. 

Presence in Absence: A Tribute and Its Controversy 

In 2022, the Tree Tribute Campaign commissioned  Presence in Absence, an installation by well-known Canadian artist Ruth Abernathy. Displayed at the Trenton and Port Hope ONroute stations, the installation served to showcase the names and facial profiles of 67 Canadians who had “paid the ultimate sacrifice”,  including Captain Nichola Goddard. 

Unfortunately, the project was marred by several errors. For one example, twelve names on the installation belonged to individuals still living. This oversight has caused deep distress for some of those who had personally attended the ramp ceremonies and witnessed their comrades’ final journeys along the Highway of Heroes. For these Veterans, seeing their names, instead of their fallen comrades', on this art installation evoked feelings of survivor’s guilt, dishonour, and disrespect to their memories. 

Lessons for Future Commemoration  

With a federal election expected no later than October 2025, now is a good time for all Canadians to reflect on what Veterans should rightfully expect from their government. Could the $3 million allocated by VAC for this project have been better spent on direct care and support of Veterans? Could it have been better used on research —a pressing issue identified in both the 2019 Women Veteran Forum report and the Invisible No More. The Experience of Canadian Women Veterans report. 

Moving forward, commemorative projects funded by VAC require enhanced oversight and quality assurance to better prevent unintentially harming the very Veterans VAC is supposed to honour and serve. Veterans should never be treated as a commodity or product for the use of public or corporate projects. 

A Call to Honour the Fallen 

The Highway of Heroes serves as a reminder about the true cost of freedom. As Canadians, it’s our shared responsibility, if not duty, to ensure that commemoration efforts reflect real respect and gratitude.  

Those who made the ultimate sacrifice for Canada deserve nothing less. 

ACVA HIGHLIGHTS – PART 16 – THE GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE

Dr. Megan MacKenzie,  Author of Arbour Report Recommendation Implementation Report Card 

Photo Credit: Dr. MacKenzie 

Esprit de Corps Magazine December 2024 // Volume 31 Issue 11 

Let's Talk About Women in the Military – Column 69 

By Military Woman

Question:

What was the government’s response to the 42 recommendations in the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs (ACVA) report, Invisible No More. The Experiences of Canadian Women Veterans?

Answer:

Before diving into the government’s response,  let’s first thank Member of Parliament (MP) Rachel Blaney and her office for hosting the Second Annual Parliamentary Reception in Honour of Women Veterans on October 28, 2024.

This inspiring event featured speeches from three women Veterans — Carly Arkell, Donna Riguidel, and Louise Siew — all of whom had testified as part of the ACVA study on Women Veterans (see Esprit de Corps, Vol. 30, Issues 5 and 10 for summaries). One speaker described MP Blaney as today’s 'Alexa McDonough' for her outstanding dedication to social justice issues.  Many hope that MP Blaney will stay involved in the Veteran community after she retires from Parliament next election.

The reception had over 70 attendees, including the Minister and Deputy Minister of Veterans Affairs, Canada’s Ambassador for Women, Peace and Security, and the Defence Team’s Champion for Women LGen Lise Bourgon. Even MPs Blake Richards and James Bezan, both of whom missed the June 12, 2024, celebration of the ACVA report’s release, were also able to attend (see Esprit de Corps, Vol. 31, Issue 6 for more on the June 12th event).

Unfortunately, there was minimal representation from Veterans Affairs Canada’s (VAC) Office of Women Veterans and 2SLGBTQI+ Veterans, even though the invitation was open to all. The Champion of Women Veterans’ Health was also absent, reinforcing community concerns about the office’s invisibility since it moved from VAC’s ‘Policy’ section to its  ‘Public Affairs’ team in summer 2023.  

Many of us believe that the best way for VAC to honour women Veterans is not through focusing on events, but by equitably supporting us with evidence-based, sex- and gender-informed policies, research, benefits, services, and programs.

The Government’s Response to the ACVA Report on Women Veterans

On October 10, 2024, the government tabled its formal response to the ACVA report’s recommendations. At first glance, the response seems supportive: the government agreed or agreed in principle with 38 of the 42 recommendations, took note of three, and disagreed with only one (Recommendation #18).

Veterans familiar with “government-speak” can often tell when official responses may not lead to real action. Many in the community felt let down by the lack of a clear plan to implement the recommendations that were agreed to (see Esprit de Corps, Vol. 31, Issue 9 for the hoped-for actions). There’s growing frustration with the government’s “say-do” gap, especially among women Veterans. While many VAC programs have improved for Veterans overall, they all too often still overlook inclusion of the challenges unique to women — particularly those related to service-related disabilities tied to women’s biological, physiological, and hormonal factors.

For instance, mental health challenges that can be worsened by pregnancy, postpartum, and perimenopause remain “invisible” topics in Veteran studies and policies. Naming a strong Women Veterans Council will be an essential step to ensure that women’s voices meaningfully help shape VAC’s programs and services — “Nothing about us, without us.” Additionally, VAC frontline staff and civilian healthcare providers both need more training to better understand women Veteran culture and prevent unnecessary re-traumatizations.

Ultimately, federal budgets reflect a government’s commitment level to change. Next year’s VAC budget will need dedicated funding for long-term research, together with the military, on issues specific to women Veterans for meaningful change to happen.

For full implementation of the ACVA report recommendations, external oversight is likely needed.  As was seen with the Deschamps Report, which led to the naming of an external monitor for implementation of the Arbour Report recommendations. Similar accountability tools used for the Arbour Report like Dr. Megan Mackenzie’s “Report Card” could be adapted by women Veterans to externally track the ACVA report recommendations implementation progress. 

Bottom Line

While the government’s response to the ACVA report on Women Veteran’s Experiences appears positive, meaningful implementation will likely require external oversight. If you are a woman Veteran, consider adding your voice to the ‘Report Card’ being developed at OpACVA.ca to help ensure real change happens.

Is Parliament Really “Broken”?

Colonel (Retired) Alex Ruff, MP and his daughter  

Photo Credit: Facebook 

Esprit de Corps Magazine November 2024 // Volume 31 Issue 10 

Let's Talk About Women in the Military – Column 68 

By Military Woman

Question:

Is Parliament really as “broken” as some suggest?

Answer:

Not at all! Let’s take a closer look at how collaboration among elected Members of Parliament (MPs) recently helped six Afghan women parliamentarians find safety in Canada.

Until August 2021, Afghan women were making impressive strides toward gender equality, increasing their representation in Afghanistan’s Parliament. This progress was closely monitored by the international community, with Canada specifically supporting programs that encouraged and prepared these women for high-profile political roles.

Afghan Mission Not Yet Complete

After August 2021, these women became prime targets for the Taliban’s campaign of violence and oppression. Many female MPs, fearing for their lives, reached out to Canada for help as they were forced into hiding or exile. A list of about a dozen Afghan women MPs seeking safety in Canada was collected and shared with Canadian parliamentarians.

By summer 2022, the situation for Afghan women had become increasingly dire, as highlighted in the article “Afghan Mission Not Yet Complete” (Esprit de Corps, Volume 29, Issue 6). Meanwhile, these women MPs continued to wait for the painfully slow wheels of Canada’s federal bureaucracy to turn.

Canadian MPs Take Action

By fall 2022, the urgency of the situation prompted MPs Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe (Bloc Québécois), Elizabeth May (Green Party), Heather McPherson (NDP), Marcus Powlowski (Liberal Party), Leah Taylor Roy (Liberal Party), and Colonel (Retired) Alex Ruff (Conservative Party) to come together. These six MPs chose to collaborate across party lines to achieve a shared mission: ensuring the safety of their fellow MPs.

“It was because of us [that they are now in danger]. We encouraged them [to enter politics],” one of the MPs emphasized, highlighting Canada’s responsibility to assist these high-risk Afghan women.

In January 2023, shockwaves were felt globally when Mursal Nabizada, a well-known MP on the list of those waiting to come to Canada, was shot dead in her home in Kabul.

It’s a Choice to Call Parliament “Broken”
By fall 2024, six Afghan women MPs, along with Nabizada’s surviving family, had finally arrived in Canada—safe at last.

This humanitarian achievement by our elected parliamentarians is a powerful testament to Canada’s ongoing solidarity with Afghan women. In an era where political polarization often dominates the news, it’s heartwarming to see MPs like Ruff willing to “forget about the partizan baloney” and focus instead on “doing the right thing to help.” This situation shows that bureaucratic red tape can be managed when necessary, and that parliamentarians from all parties can work effectively and respectfully together—when they choose to.

Overall this success story challenges the notion that Canada’s Parliament is “broken.” The determination of these parliamentarians to bring Afghan women MPs to safety offers hope—not just for a brighter future for these brave women and their families, but also for Canada to serve as a model of cross-party collaboration for others to respect and emulate.

Gender Apartheid Must Become a Prosecutable Crime

While we celebrate the success of these Canadian MPs in helping six Afghan women MPs and their families immigrate to Canada, the broader crisis in Afghanistan remains dire. Afghan women continue to endure unbearable conditions, and many more women refugees, including members of the  Afghan women’s soccer team, are still waiting for Canada’s promised help.

Canada, along with the international community, must continue fierce advocacy for the reversal of the Taliban’s oppressive policies and the reinstatement of Afghan women’s human rights. As conditions in Afghanistan  deteriorate worse than ever imagined, “gender apartheid” must become a prosecutable crime against humanity by the International Court of Justice.

A Call for Continued Action

Canadians extend their gratitude to MPs Duceppe, May, McPherson, Powlowski, Roy, and Ruff, who embody Margaret Mead’s quote: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”

Together, these MPs have shown that Parliament isn’t really “broken” and that collaboration is still possible. That’s important news and a source of hope for the many who know that  Canada's mission in Afghanistan remains not yet complete.

ACVA Highlights – Part 15 – Key Hopes for the Government’s Response

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Minister of Veterans Affairs Ginette Petitpas Taylor 

Photo Credit: Government of Canada  

Esprit de Corps Magazine October 2024 // Volume 31 Issue 9 

Let's Talk About Women in the Military – Column 67 

By Military Woman

Question:
What can we hope to see in the government’s response to the “Invisible No More. The Experiences of Canadian Women Veterans” study that was tabled by the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs (ACVA) on June 12, 2024?

Answer:
Many of us are still digesting this powerful 150-page parliamentary report. The challenge not being the report’s length as much as the gut-kicking testimonials used throughout the report in support of the 42 recommendations. It’s a report best read in small portions to allow for the time required to absorb the full gravity of the information presented.

Besides accepting all the recommendations, a few other key hopes to be part of the government’s response, due no later than October 10, 2024, include:

1. Clarify the Ministerial Lead.
   Over half of the report’s recommendations require collaboration between Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC), the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), and the Department of National Defence (DND). Hopefully, the Minister of Veterans Affairs takes clear charge for the recommendation’s implementation plan and uses this opportunity to formalise her already standing, but undefined, role as Associate Minister of National Defence. Using these dual roles is likely to be crucial for the successful navigation and collaboration required between VAC and CAF/DND.  

   Hopefully, the experiences and lessons learned from this report will be openly shared by VAC with CAF/DND (and RCMP) to prevent similar Veteran experiences for those women still serving.

   Collaboration also with both the Minister of Mental Health and Women and Gender Equality (WAGE) would also be valuable, particularly in developing and formalising training practices for frontline workers that interact with trauma and violence-exposed Veterans (Recommendations 30-31).

2. Assign Department Leads.
   It will be likewise crucial for department leads to also be able to freely liaise both within and outside of  CAF/DND/RCMP/VAC. Christine McDowell, the new Associate Deputy Minister at VAC, seems like a natural fit for this role, supported by LGen Lise Bourgon, CAF’s Champion for Women and Chief of Military Personnel. Together, they can ensure all work through the women’s subcommittee of the CAF/VAC Joint Steering Committee is well coordinated. (Recommendation 37).

3. Define “Successful Implementation”.
   A key takeaway from the infamous Deschamps report is the importance of seeking the input from those most affected before declaring any recommendation as being “successfully implemented”.  It is hoped that the new “Women Veterans Council” or ministerial advisory group will ensure that impacted women Veterans agree before the government lists any recommendation as being “implemented”. (Recommendation 36).

4. Ensure Implementation Plan Resources are Available.
   It is essential that resources needed for recommendation implementation are identified and included within next year’s budget and all parties’ election platforms. Occupational and environmental hazard related issues in particular will likely require new resources.  Despite this topic being on the Prime Minister’s Mandate Letter for the MND since 2021, to date, it has largely been ignored. (Recommendations 1,16, 17,20 and 22).

5. Enhanced Government Accountability to Veterans and Canadians.

   Sadly, many parliamentary reports end up gathering dust, with their recommendations often left systemically unaddressed. To prevent this ACVA report from suffering the same fate, it is hoped that a special committee combining National Defence (NDDN) and ACVA together is established to ensure the cross-departmental recommendations in the report remain on government’s radar.

   Canadians need to hold their parliamentarians and public servants accountable for following through on the report’s recommendations. It is hoped that advocacy groups representing CAF, RCMP and Veteran members, including the soon to be announced “Women Veterans Council”, will prioritize the report’s recommendations.

   When the fall 2024 parliamentary session begins again, it is hoped that all parliamentarians take a moment to reflect on their individual and collective responsibilities to provide civilian oversight of the military. Ensuring the health and well-being of military and RCMP Veterans is an entrusted sacred duty to the Members of Parliament by those that elected them. 

Let’s work together to get these ACVA report recommendations implemented!

MENOPAUSE IN THE WORKPLACE

LGen Lise Bourgon, Chief of Military Personnel and Defence Team Women’s Champion

Photo Credit: Lise Bourgon

Esprit de Corps Magazine September 2024 // Volume 31 Issue 8

Let's Talk About Women in the Military – Column 66

By Military Woman

Question:

Can we discuss the experience of menopause while serving in the military?

Answer:

Absolutely!

Have you ever found yourself uncomfortably hot while outside during the summer? Now, imagine that same feeling of “overheating” happening unexpectedly at any time and place – whether you’re resting, sleeping, or working in the office. This can be a common experience for military members undergoing menopause – read on to learn more.

What is Menopause?

Menopause is defined as having gone without a period (menstruation) for one year. Most people experience menopause between the ages of 45 and 55, averaging 51. “Early menopause” can still happen naturally despite occurring between the ages of 40 and 45. Whereas, “premature menopause” is usually linked to medical treatments or external environmental hazard exposures causing symptoms to occur before the age of 40, unnaturally.

What Are the Symptoms of Menopause?

In the context of the workplace, it is often “perimenopause” rather than menopause itself that presents the challenges. Perimenopause refers to the transition period leading up to menopause, typically starting in a person’s early to mid-40s and lasting up to eight years.

Perimenopause is a highly individual experience that can range from being completely asymptomatic to profoundly disabling. The most recognized perimenopausal symptoms are vasomotor related  “hot flashes”. However, about 20% of women never experience hot flashes but may instead experience a variety of  alternative symptoms.

Why Does Menopause Matter to the Military?  

The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) only started opening all military trades to women in 1989. Consequently, it is only recently that the military is seeing a significant number of still-serving members that are also experiencing perimenopause and postmenopausal changes.

Historically, the CAF has not specifically addressed or researched menopausal women’s needs.

Greater institutional awareness on how to minimize menopausal-related quality of life and work performance challenges could result in improved retention rates for military women.

What Can the Military Do to Better Support Menopause-Related Issues?

• Increase Awareness: Ensure all military members are informed about issues related to menopause  and are able to discuss accommodations for a perimenopausal-related workplace request without bias or stigma. For those still serving, explore the “Women’s and Diversity Health” intranet links on menopause and other related topics.

• Prepare Leaders: Equip military leaders to address concerns related to common perimenopausal symptoms, such as “brain fog”, and physical training challenges, including those resulting from new onset urinary incontinence or pelvic floor prolapses.

• Educate Healthcare Providers: Enable military healthcare providers to confidently address  perimenopause-related symptoms, and offer counseling on menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) – formerly known as hormone replacement therapy (HRT) – before considering other medications or diagnoses, such as for anxiety or depression.

• Update Policies: Ensure all policy updates, including those for healthcare, are inclusive of normal lifecycle issues, including around menopause.

• Support Research: Mandate that all federally funded research include all lifecycle stages of military and Veteran members, including pre- and post-menopause.

• Learn from Others: Collaborate with the UK, which is a leader in addressing these issues in both the military and civilian workplaces.

What Can Military Members Do to Better Support Themselves Through Menopause?

Military members, especially leaders, can work towards normalizing menopause. More open dialogue about menopausal-related symptoms and the many ways available to help mitigate the workplace impacts of those symptoms is required. We can all help to normalize the symptoms such as hot flashes, disrupted sleep patterns, and brain fog, which so many members experience during their 40s and 50s. Increasing our own awareness of menopause as a normal life stage can help foster a supportive and inclusive workplace for all.  

What About Male Menopause? 

Yes, this is a real thing. Medically it is commonly referred to as “andropause.” However, the symptoms of andropause are less likely to cause the workplace-related challenges commonly associated with menopause.  

In Summary: When We Know Better, We Can Do Better

The CAF is responsible for providing all of its members, at every stage of life, with the knowledge and support needed to succeed and thrive at work. Supporting CAF members through menopause, and other lifecycle changes, is a concrete example of the ongoing culture evolution to put its “people first.”

MUSINGS FOR THE SUMMER OF 2024

Summertime Sunset

Photo Credit: Military Woman

Esprit de Corps Magazine August 2024 // Volume 31 Issue 7

Let's Talk About Women in the Military – Column 65

By Military Woman

Question:

During the summer of 2022, there was a “Lazy, Hazy, Crazy Days of Summer” Military Woman column about various things to think about, discuss, and even debate with friends and family. Is there a similar list of musings for the summer of 2024?

Answer:

Sure! In the same spirit as the August 2022 column (Volume 29 Issue 7), here are some questions to ponder while sitting around the campfire.

Should the defence world be expecting the possibility of some major paradigm shifts in our near future?

It certainly feels like important society level changes are happening around the world, Canada included. Especially for some of the defence related decisions to be made in the next year or two they seem likely to impact Canada’s place in the world for decades to come.

Is it time for Canadians to formally redefine how much is “too much” for injured and ill Veterans to ask for?

It will soon be the appropriate timing to sunset legacy programs originally created for the Veterans of the Great Wars, that have since become very complex and piecemealed programs when applied to other Veterans. With a federal election happening on or before October 2025, it is an opportune time to challenge political parties to hold an Inquiry (or Royal Commission) into the best way forward, if elected, to ensure a more sustainable and effective approach to supporting Veterans.  Together, we could reimagine a more transparent, accountable, cost-effective, simpler, equitable and coordinated support system for all Veterans. If not, especially with Canada’s ongoing  military recruitment and retention struggles, the alternative discussion might need to be about  mandatory national service, also known as conscription.

When will the federal government move beyond the men-only occupational hazard research of the 1970s to obtain updated research, inclusive of women workers and workplace reproductive hazard considerations?

Government related policy decisions, including claim adjudications for Veterans, that are based on research that did not include women cannot be assumed as fair or evidence-based to then apply to women. More research, in specific on women in the military workplace, is required.

Is it time for the Department of National Defence to update its approach to assessing the human health hazard risks related to  federally contaminated sites on military bases?

The lessons learned from CFB Gagetown and Agent Orange, and a growing number of other base-related environmental contamination concerns, have yet to be optimally collected and publicly communicated for the common good of all those who have worked and lived on these sites.

Could all three levels of government work together to ensure at least one flexible-hour daycare option was always available to support operational and essential workers (i.e. ambulance, fire, police, dispatchers, medical staff and military members)?

Given the shortage of family doctors, could the federal government do more to ensure continuity of medical care after military release?

Could the federal government fund a new billing code to allow family doctors to meet for an hour or two, instead of 15 minutes, with newly released military members so as to ensure Veterans a more seamless transfer from federal to provincial health care responsibilities?

With almost a third of Canadian women Veterans living alone,  is “Veterans and their family” an inclusive phrase?

Is it time to follow the US example of  “Veterans and their family, friends and caregivers?”

Could the federal government automatically provide all military (and RCMP) members with mental health benefit supports for two years after release?

Why does VAC only offer mental health benefits to Veterans after they submit a claim for a diagnosed chronic mental health condition? Why instead couldn’t VAC treat mental and physical health as two sides of the same coin, and also offer mental health benefit coverage for those with physical condition claims, such as chronic pain? Better yet, why wouldn’t government provide mental health benefit supports to any Veteran that asks for such help? Why not proactively support all Veterans that self-identify as suffering from things like moral injury,  military sexual trauma, grieving, burnout, compassion fatigue, institutional betrayal, combat-related stress reactions, and life transition stresses?

Can women Veterans (military and RCMP) come together to help government prioritise which recommendations from the recent “Invisible No More. Experience of Canadian Women Veterans” study to implement first ? Nothing About Us Without Us.

What are your summer musings?

HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE ACVA – PART 14 –REPORT PUBLISHED ON JUNE 12, 2024

Emmanuel Dubourg, MP and ACVA Chair

Photo Credit: Instagram

Esprit de Corps Magazine July 2024 // Volume 31 Issue 6

Let's Talk About Women in the Military – Column 64

By Military Woman

Question: 

The report “Invisible No More. The Experiences of Canadian Women Veterans” was released by the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs (ACVA) on June 12, 2024. How did it go?

Answer:

The June 12, 2024, release of the ACVA study’s 156-page report on the “Experience of Women Veterans”, elicited a range of emotions from those involved.

Most felt relief that the report was successfully published before Parliament’s summer recess. Anyone familiar with the parliamentary process knows that completing a study does not guarantee achieving a final report. For instance, the UK’s snap election resulted in its inaugural “Women Veteran Strategy” report not being tabled as planned this June.

Many participants of the various June 12th events expressed pride that their experiences as military and RCMP members had been formally acknowledged by all parties in Parliament and were now part of a permanent Canadian record. Veterans hoped that by sharing their experiences others could benefit from their lessons learned, especially the future generations of military and RCMP women. A summary document highlighting the testimonies of the many Veterans who appeared on this study is available on the “Transforming Military Cultures (TMC) DND MINDS Collaborative Network” website under the tabs for “Outputs” and then “Resources.”  The document includes a compilation of all past “Experience of Women Veterans” ACVA study – related Esprit de Corps “Military Woman” magazine columns.

The release of the ACVA report also fostered a sense of camaraderie. The event attendees included dozens of military and RCMP Veterans and their supporters including, but not limited to, representatives from the Senate, Provincial Parliament of Ontario, Veterans Ombud’s Office, Royal Canadian Legion, RCMP Veterans’ Association, National Association of Federal Retirees, Sexual Misconduct Support and Resource Centre, Respect Canada, Servicewomen’s Salute, Survivor Perspectives, True Patriot Love, Pepper Pod, Women Peace and Security Network – Canada, Federation of Medical Women of Canada and the Chronic Pain Centre of Excellence for Canadian Veterans.

Others attending felt a mix of emotions, including the kind of healing that only happens when together in community, rather than sitting alone in a psychologist’s office. Many who testified were unable to attend Parliament in person for the June 12th report tabling, so they spontaneously organized virtual watch parties to share in the experience and support each other. Healing comes from being with similarly wounded peers and together feeling heard, believed, and seen by an institution previously felt to have betrayed your loyalty to it.

Some attendees were eager to get working on a woman Veteran-led implementation plan for the report’s 42 recommendations. We hope to explore this topic further in a future column.

Unfortunately, not all of the June 12th experiences were positive. During Member of Parliament (MP) Rachel Blaney’s recognition of the many Veterans in the gallery, some well-known supporters of the military, including MP James Bezan, did not participate in the standing ovation. This lack of acknowledgement from the Shadow Minister of National Defence exemplifying why women Veterans so often still feel their sacrifice and service are “invisible,” even when wearing multi-tour racks of medals, including from Afghanistan.

Additionally, during Question Period, Veterans felt unseen once again when the Minister of Veterans Affairs discussed affordable housing needs in front of a gallery full of Veterans without once referencing the specific housing challenges faced by Veterans.

The report’s tabling by ACVA Chair MP Emmanuel Dubourg was powerful and emotional.

A press conference followed, largely held in French but it can be watched on CPAC in the language of your choice. Despite all ACVA committee members being in Parliament that day, only three parties were represented at the all-party press conference. It was indeed a surprise to many Veterans (and MPs) that MP Blake Richards, Shadow Minister of Veterans Affairs and ACVA Vice Chair, neither presented his party’s supplementary report nor attended the press conference for this important study.

Moving forward, a final thank you to ACVA Chair MP Dubourg for his consistent efforts to keep the study focused on Veterans versus the all-too-often attempts of partisan-related exploitation of those Veterans.

With this historic and precedent setting #InvisibleNoMore study on the experiences of Canadian women Veterans being tabled on June 12 we also join, by chance, with our US Veteran community in acknowledging this as a special day for women Veterans.

Highlights From the ACVA – Part 13 – Report Finalized

Vicky-Lynn Cox, Veteran

Photo Credit: Facebook

Esprit de Corps Magazine June 2024 // Volume 31 Issue 5

Let's Talk About Women in the Military – Column 63

By Military Woman

Question:

What’s next for the “Experience of Women Veterans” study?

Answer:

On May 6, 2024, the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs (ACVA) completed a comprehensive study, resulting in a report exceeding 100 pages. The report includes over 40 recommendations, drawn from the input of 93 witnesses and 10 submitted briefs. The next phase involves officially tabling the report in the House of Commons prior to its public release scheduled for June 12, 2024.

The Minister of Veterans Affairs is presently creating a “Women Veteran Council” (WVC) to advise her on matters such as how to best prioritize and execute the recommendations from this and other parliamentary reports. It is anticipated that the WVC will be functional by September 2024.

ACVA’s next study is “Transition to Civilian Life”. As part of this study, several women Veterans testified, including Vicky-Lynn Cox, on February 26, 2024. She highlighted some of the difficulties women can face when transitioning from the military, particularly concerning the reporting, and recovering from sexual misconduct related events. She recommended dedicated personnel should exist within the workplace transition process to address sexual violence prevention and care. Additionally, she emphasised the importance of automatic access to peer and mental health support for sexual misconduct victims and their families, similar to the supports made automatically available for individuals with operational stress injuries. She underscored how sexual misconduct can also affect the partners and children of women Veterans. While expressing gratitude for programs like “Camp Maple Leaf” and “COPE” (Couples Overcoming PTSD Everyday) from Wounded Warriors Canada, she also noted negative experiences with other programs. To ensure the well-being of all Veterans, she stressed the need for better oversight mechanisms, especially for women Veteran focused programs, including those funded by the Veteran and Family Well-Being Fund and the Sexual Misconduct Support and Response Centre (SMSRC).

Vicky-Lynn Cox also reinforced the previous ACVA testimony of Marie-Ève Doucet. Both are previous airframe technicians, calling for increased government research on the impact of workplace reproductive chemical hazards on military/Veteran women and their unborn children.

Stephanie Hayward’s testimony on April 29, 2024, provided further insights to the Transition study. She called for fairer compensation, benefits, and support for reproductive system-specific service-related injuries, highlighting deficiencies in current policies and guidelines. She specifically referenced the Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) Table of Disabilities and Entitlement Eligibility Guidelines for minimizing the life-altering impact service-related injuries and illnesses can have with respect to fertility, pregnancy, birthing, and offspring health complications.

For women Veterans facing intimate partner violence, financial insecurity, housing instability, lack of childcare access, and reproductive health issues – she called for a more comprehensively support approach by VAC. More government efforts on reproductive health-related research and services, such as pelvic floor physiotherapy are also required. Improved childcare support programs would allow mothers access to their own medical care in private, without having to expose their young children to sensitive discussion topics and examinations.

Many others also contributed to the study on “Transition to Civilian Life,” including Carolyn Hughes, Paula McDonald, Rosemary Park, Sandra Perron and Donna Riguidel.  Some noted the positive progress being made, while others encouraged work on women Veterans’ rights, including their human rights, medical rights, and employment rights to persist.

Addressing knowledge and data gaps about the full impact of military service on women and their family's health is essential and should be a priority. Neglecting the specific needs unique to women Veterans not only negatively impacts their quality of life but can also have long-lasting intergenerational effects. The establishment of military/Veteran women’s health as a standing agenda item on the Joint Steering Committee between VAC and the military is a positive step towards ensuring inter-departmental collaboration on these critical issues.

History will be made in the House of Commons on June 12, 2024, when the first-ever comprehensive report on the experience of women Veterans is tabled. It is hoped this report will serve as a catalyst for positive change for all those women who have served – past and present.

Highlights from ACVA – Part 12

Paula MacDonald, Veteran

Photo Credit: PA MacDonald Consulting.

Esprit de Corps Magazine May 2024 // Volume 31 Issue 4

Let's Talk About Women in the Military – Column 62

By Military Woman

Question:

What’s next for the “Experience of Women Veterans” study?

Answer:

The final testimonies for this historic study by the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs (ACVA) were heard on February 7, 2024. This study is historic for both its length, with a total of 23 meetings, and its topic: Women Veterans.

Paula MacDonald, a retired military social worker, testified that despite the successful 2019 military sexual misconduct class action lawsuit, many systemic obstacles remain. The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) has not yet implemented effective workplace mechanisms for sexual violence prevention or perpetrator accountability. The sex- and gender-based analysis used by CAF and Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) should be further improved to better identify the diverse needs of those impacted by sexual misconduct. VAC continues to unnecessarily demand bureaucratic and complex documentation before those with military sexual trauma-related injuries and illnesses can access supports and care. These, and other, systemic obstacles impede Veterans from healing.

Kristina Sharp, a member of the Canadian Veteran Service Dog Unit, provided the final testimony for this ACVA study. She explained in detail the many ways in which her service dog, Stoker, has helped her heal from her service-related injuries. She called on the government to provide Veterans in need with barrier-free access to safely and appropriately trained service dogs, acknowledging the concurrent need for government-developed standards. The importance of accessing safe options of peer support for all Veterans was also emphasized. She challenged the government to develop standards for all federally funded peer support groups, especially for women Veterans.

Now that the testimonies are complete, what's next?

Firstly, gratitude is in order. Thank you to the NDP and Bloc ACVA committee members for moving the motion that created this study. Thank you to all ACVA committee members for then agreeing to making this into a longitudinal study spanning over 20 meetings. Thank you to Library of Parliament’s analyst, Jean-Rodrigue Paré, for writing the draft report and recommendations and to the many ACVA clerks that rotated through this study.

Appreciation extends to the over 90 witnesses but especially to the over 60 courageous serving and Veteran CAF and RCMP women who provided personal testimony and/or written briefs. Special thanks go to all the women Veterans who presented for the first time to a Parliamentary committee including, but not limited to:

• Vivienne Stewart, who spoke on the Merlo-Davidson RCMP class action clawbacks.

• Stephanie Hayward, who spoke about service-related reproductive injuries.

• Nicole Langlois, who shared some of her military-to-Veteran transition challenges.

• Marie-Ève Doucet, whose service-related hazard exposures occurred in Canada.

• Louise Siew, who reminded us that the “era served” for women Veterans matters.

• Lisa Nilsson, who called on VAC for more research, especially on Navy injuries.

• Lisa Cyr, who advocated for more Veteran entrepreneur and fibromyalgia supports.

• Joanne Seviour, who urged for more sexual misconduct impact awareness.

• Jessica Miller, who encouraged more peer support options for women Veterans.

• Jennifer Smith, who challenged VAC to give better support to people that are single.

• Caleigh Wong, who highlighted the impacts of racism and sexism when combined.

• Anna-Lisa Rovak, who delivered arguably the most memorable women Veteran statement of the study after feeling disrespected and objectified during an interaction with the ACVA Vice Chair:

“I am not someone else’s platform. I am not someone else’s cash cow. I am not someone else’s product. I am a human being, I am a veteran and I am strong in that.”

All these testimonies and more, including that of defence researcher Chris Edwards, can still be watched on the ACVA “Experience of Women Veterans” webpage. Also, Rachel Blaney’s YouTube channel offers a playlist of meeting highlight clips.

The next step for this study is to see the finished report and its recommendations published. Before that is possible, the Chair of the ACVA committee must formally table the finalized study report in the House of Commons.

Since this study first began, back in March 2023, many Veterans have come together to both laugh and cry.

Hopefully, our bonds will continue to grow and organize. Together, we can help to ensure the “Experience of Women Veterans” study report gets published before end of this session of Parliament – June 21, 2024.

Highlights from ACVA – Part 11

Caleigh Wong, Veteran

Photo Credit: McCall MacBain Scholars

Esprit de Corps Magazine April 2024 // Volume 31 Issue 3

Let's Talk About Women in the Military – Column 61

By Military Woman

Question:

How did the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs (ACVA) study on the “Experience of Women Veterans” end the 2023 year?

Answer:

Caleigh Wong, a reservist with five years of service including a tour in Latvia, testified at the twenty-first meeting, held on December 5, 2023. She shared a number of personal experiences of racial and sexual discrimination. Often feeling more like a tolerated guest, instead of a valued team member, she wasn’t made comfortable to speak up against the sexual misconduct and misogyny happening to and around her, especially with so few precedents of institutional justice for those that do speak out.

She also observed that those complaining the most about the ‘never-ending’ discussions on these topics, were all too often the same people tolerating and normalizing inappropriate behaviours in the military workplace.

She emphasized the need for more than an “add women and stir” cultural and attitudinal shift within the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), calling for more internal and external champions, including the ACVA members themselves. She challenged a reconfiguration of what it means to be a “good soldier.” For example, a “good soldier” by definition does not rape. Anyone. Ever.

Stephanie Hayward shared her harrowing 2009 experience of sexual violence during her basic training course. Despite her documented service-related trauma, her Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) disability claims were repeatedly denied, leading her into homelessness.

Only after an intervention by a social worker during a 2020 PTSD-related hospitalization, were her VAC disability claims, including for Critical Injury Benefit, finally accepted. However, VAC still forced her to continue the fight to access the Veterans Independence Program (VIP) and coverage for pelvic floor therapy. As a single mother, she also noted that social assistance provided better supports for her children then what they have now through VAC’s coverage of her service-related injuries.

This situation underscores why VAC’s Table of Disabilities must be further updated to address women’s and sexual assault survivor’s health issues and streamline their access to needed benefits more equitably.

The Members of Parliament Blaney and Bennett both highlighted government’s apparent inability to link sexual trauma with poor pregnancy labour outcomes, postpartum, and/or perinatal mental health issues. MP Bennett noting “…the data isn't there even while people are serving, so VAC doesn't seem to know that this should be compensable. We're hearing a lot that there should be a presumptive approach in terms of compensation.”

At the twenty-second meeting on December 7th, 2023, VAC representatives acknowledged women Veterans as their fastest growing group of new clients. In support of the approximately 75,000 women Veterans, VAC recently organized women’s roundtables on employment, homelessness, and the establishment of an advisory council. The Joint CAF-VAC Steering Committee recently added military/Veteran women issues as a standing agenda item to improve on issue coordination between the two departments. VAC acknowledged ongoing research gaps for women Veterans, especially regarding reproductive health, but did not share (yet) what its plan is to address this longstanding source of data inequity.

VAC’s Chief Medical Officer, herself a Veteran, clarified her previous ACVA comments of May 4, 2023, regarding women being able to send their health-related complaints to a 1-800-Cyd-Courchesne number. There is, in fact, unlike in the US, no dedicated contact or support phoneline for women Veterans. VAC has however introduced a new women Veteran’s section to its monthly e-newsletter, “Salute!”

A representative from the CAF Transition Group explained his mandate to support the ill and injured members and their families, including through the Operational Stress Injury Social Support (OSISS) program. With approximately 150 staff and volunteers, OSISS completes around 2,000 peer support contacts per month, primarily to Veterans and their families. OSISS supports all those with operational stress Injuries (OSI), i.e. persistent psychological difficulty from military operations, training, domestic or international operations, or burnout from military life stressors. The CAF Transition Group member acknowledged that military sexual trauma (MST) can result in an OSI.

Representatives from the Sexual Misconduct Support and Resource Centre (SMSRC) outlined their programs, including a 24/7/365 support phone line available at 1-844-750-1648. VAC again acknowledged for themselves, and Atlas, that SMSRC is the “lead for all matters of military sexual trauma.”

All groups, VAC and Veterans alike, eagerly await the final recommendations from this important “Experience of Women Veterans” ACVA study to be released in 2024.

Update:

• 2024. VAC has initiated an email address (women-veterans_femmes-veterans@veterans.gc.ca) specific for women to use if they have women specific issues to discuss.

Highlights from ACVA – Part 10

Jane Hall, Veteran at her daughter’s graduation

Photo Credit: Jane Hall 

Esprit de Corps Magazine March 2024 // Volume 31 Issue 2

Let's Talk About Women in the Military – Column 60

By Military Woman

Question:

What else has been happening at the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs (ACVA) study on the “Experience of Women Veterans”?

Answer:

Jane Hall, from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) Veteran Women's Council, was first to testify on the nineteen meeting of this study, held on November 28, 2023. She shared that 2024 would mark the 50th anniversary of RCMP women and thanked all those that had helped to pave the, sometimes rocky, pathway to that achievement.

She shared some long-standing statistics of higher attrition rates for RCMP women versus men. She cited one of the causes for this differential being the ongoing presence, in some locations, of an unhealthy workplace culture. She reminded the committee that the Council’s “Addressing a Crisis in Leadership” 2014 report provided, yet unimplemented, recommendations on how to address these issues.

Hall further explained the differences in attrition rates as being related to inadequate systemic supports to optimize female-sex specific needs for uniforms, equipment, and physical and psychological illnesses and injuries. She urged Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) to provide more research and supports for female RCMP Veterans, especially related to psychological and reproductive health needs. She also urged the government to focus on the action recommendations to come from this ACVA study, as organizational and systemic changes for uniformed women are already long overdue.

Jessica Miller, a retired military medic who now runs the Veteran Farm Project, was next to testify. She named it as a failure of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) senior leadership not to have better recognized and supported military sexual trauma (MST) impacted members. This collective leadership inaction around prevention of CAF members’ sexual misconduct related workplace injuries and illnesses served to create and sustain a culture of silence around the issue. The institutional silencing around MST topics has resulted in deepening and furthering of the harms caused by CAF to its own people. This culture of silence around MST then follows and impedes many MST impacted members’ ability to optimally transition to a life outside of the military.

The Veteran Farm Project was started to give women Veterans a safe space to heal from their service-related traumas and rebuild their lives through connection with nature, community, and peers. Miller called for more VAC research and supports for grassroot organizations, like hers, to help empower and foster MST impacted women Veterans’ long-term well-being. She urged VAC to do more research into the effectiveness of the programs it funds. She knows first-hand that programs like the Farm Project work and that similar project to hers could be reproduced elsewhere – if given the chance.

Veterans Transition Network (VTN) testimony encouraged VAC to ensure its research and programming better included the unique challenges and experiences of women Veterans especially around social isolation and family care responsibilities. VTN also challenged government to more robustly recognize and address members’ sanctuary traumas caused from the institution’s response/non-response to various events.

The twentieth meeting of this study was held on November 30, 2023, and began with the testimony of Nina Charlene Usherwood, a 42-year military Veteran. She shared some of her military struggles, including discrimination, that she believes contributed to, if not caused, her physical health issues, including diabetes.

She recommended government prioritize an update to the Employment Equity Act, further empowerment of the Defence Advisory Groups (DAGs), and improved data collection processes, including specifically for those identifying as transgender.

Vivienne Stewart, RCMP Veteran Women's Council co-chair, shared her personal disappointment in how many years it was after her resignation from the RCMP before she learned that she was a Veteran, eligible for VAC programs and services.

She criticized VAC for not having better information dissemination methods and operating too much like an insurance company, instead of a service provider. She also questioned past VAC interpretations of the Merlo-Davidson Class Action Settlement which, to her as a lawyer herself, unnecessarily negatively impacted many RCMP Veteran women, including former RCMP Constable Krista Carlé. RIP.

More robust RCMP (and CAF) exit interviews and VAC intake interviews were also recommended. Indeed, if government captured and actioned more lived experience feedback, Veterans may start to feel more respected, understood, and supported.

Highlights from ACVA – Part 9

Marie-Ève Doucet, Veteran

Photo Credit: LinkedIn

Esprit de Corps Magazine February 2024 // Volume 31 Issue 1

Let's Talk About Women in the Military – Column 59

By Military Woman

Question:

What else has been happening at the “Experience of Women Veterans” study?

Answer:

The seventeenth meeting of this Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs (ACVA) study was held on November 7, 2023. Serving RCMP, including the Commanding Officers of B Division, Jennifer Ebert, and J Division, DeAnna Hill, reinforced the positive impacts made by applying gender-based analysis plus (GBA+)  to federally funded projects. For example, GBA Plus helped during the recent RCMP pistol modernization project to identify the benefits of offering more pistol grip options for those with smaller hand sizes.

The study’s eighteenth meeting, held on November 9, 2023, included particularly poignant and personal accounts from two former Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) members.

Marie-Ève Doucet, worked on and around the CF-18 Hornet Jet for over twenty years – first as an Aviation Systems Technician and then as a Non Destructive Testing Technician. She outlined to the committee her extensive exposure to radiation and multiple carcinogens, including ultrafine air particles. Diagnosed with a pineal gland brain cancer in her late thirties, which has since spread into her spinal cord, she was dismayed at the swiftness with which Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) denied her disability benefit claim. In the denial, VAC cited the lack of available research to prove a service relationship to her rare medical condition.

She notes that not only is there scant workplace hazard surveillance documentation in her military records but what government research studies that are available, are largely male only studies. This ongoing bias in government research actively discriminates against military women, especially for health conditions where women may present with different symptoms and disease patterns then found in men.

Compounding her concerns, is VAC's apparent expectation that it is the impacted Veteran themselves that should be held responsible for the lack of military specific research available to support Veterans’ disability claims. Why would it not be the Government of Canada, their employer, with the responsibility to ensure and prove workplace safety? This apparent catch-22, no win possible, situation feels like an institutional betrayal.

She therefore hopes that ACVA supports her recommendation for presumptive VAC claim approvals for all military women with known occupational hazard exposures and potentially related health conditions at least until the formal establishment and implementation of a CAF-VAC military women’s research plan. Such a longitudinal surveillance research plan must also include the review of female-sex specific reproductive workplace hazards and their potential for epigenetic and other health related impacts on military women’s offspring.

Jennifer Smith testified to truly horrendous experiences on naval bases and at sea during the early days of CAF gender integration. She explained how her military experiences continue to negatively impact her today in all domains of her wellbeing – physically, mentally, socially, housing security, employment, financially and sense of life purpose.

She provided specific examples of ongoing unmet needs from VAC to address her specific situation. She underscored that many of her challenges with VAC seem to be specifically because of her status as a woman, who is single, and with largely invisible injuries. Despite marital and family status being a mandated Canadian Human Rights Act equity consideration for all VAC benefits, programs, services, and research – the many inequities that result from VAC’s ongoing privileging and prioritizing of supports for married Veterans over single Veterans remains stark.

Smith called on VAC to modernize its disability benefit adjudication process, benefits, programs and services, and case manager training to better support women's health issues and needs. She would also like to see VAC accept, without questioning, civilian health care practitioner’s recommendations and prescriptions. Lastly, she calls on more investments in women Veteran specific research and for VAC to stop its unstated assumption that all Veterans will have a co-located, caregiving capable, spouse in place to provide the injured/ill Veteran with their first line of supports.

VAC clearly has room for improvements, especially to better address the unique challenges faced by women Veterans. Hopefully this ACVA study’s final report, due out in early 2024, will provide the Minister of Veterans Affairs with a roadmap of how to rapidly evolve her department into a more fair and inclusive experience better able to meet the needs of ALL injured and ill Veterans, women included.

Highlights from ACVA – Part 8

Brigitte Laverdure, Veteran

Photo Credit: Facebook

Esprit de Corps Magazine January 2024 // Volume 30 Issue 12

Let's Talk About Women in the Military – Column 58

By Military Woman

Question:

What else has happened on the “Experience of Women Veterans” Parliamentary study?

Answer:

Three women Veterans testified October 26th, 2023, for the fifteenth study meeting of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs (ACVA).

Nicole Langlois served from 1990-1997 in the combat arms. Her career highlights included being a frontline peacekeeper and achieving her M113 tracked vehicle operator certification. She shared with the committee, several service-related physical and mental challenges she faced as both a woman and a single parent.

After retiring, she felt like she “disappeared.” She found it hard to translate her army skills into meaningful civilian jobs. She tried a number of diverse jobs including as school bus operator, sports coach, security guard, custodian, and teacher.

After struggling to find her post-military life’s purpose for almost two decades, she admitted needing help. When she first shared the ongoing impact of her military experiences with her civilian health care providers, unfamiliar with Veterans, they misdiagnosed her. It was only after, as a last resort, she turned to Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) that she finally received a correct medical diagnosis and treatment plan.

She recommended the committee read the 2022 British study entitled, “Exploring Barriers to Mental Health Treatment in the Female Veteran Population: A Qualitative Study.” She also recommended for women Veterans to get more education about mental health stereotypes, including reluctance to seek medical help and any women-specific VAC services, including support groups.

Alice Aiken served first in the Naval Reserves as a MARS officer and then in the Regular Force as a Physiotherapist. She is also the founder of the Canadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research (CIMVHR). She focused her testimony on her experience to date with the Restorative Engagement component of the 2019 CAF-DND Sexual Misconduct Class Action Lawsuit. “I became part of the suit because I wanted to tell my story, and I keep getting notes saying, ’Well, we have to talk to 20,000 of you, and they’re on number 438.’”

“I’m not sure why the military would have started this process if it wasn’t ready with, I don’t know, thousands of counsellors on hand to take people’s stories. It just seems to me to be bad planning… There seemed to be lots of money but very little support.”

She concluded with a plea for committee members to not “underestimate the seriousness of the suffering of some of my sisters in arms. This is important work you're doing; it's not political. Please take it seriously.”

Brigitte Laverdure testified that although her sexual assault occurred over 40 years ago during basic training, she still relives it today. She remained silent after the event initially to ensure her military career continued. She experienced several other traumatic events in the military but was never offered psychological supports. After almost 20 years of service, she was medically released in a manner that left her feeling miserable and alone.

Today she volunteers with the Veterans Ombud Advisory Council and enjoys helping Veterans with their VAC claims. She is shocked at how often Veterans still do not know what they are entitled to. She also notes, that in her lived experience, some federally funded support groups, like Operational Stress Injury Social Support (OSISS) still do not fully “support the LGBTQ people.”

She recommended government offer psychological support to all, especially after traumatic workplace events, more proactively. She also recommended higher experience levels for those working in military-Veteran transition areas and for more Veterans, especially women, to be hired to work at VAC.

The sixteenth ACVA study meeting, held October 31, 2023, saw three non-Veterans testifying. They represented the Veterans Emergency Transition Services (VETS) Canada, the Canadian War Museum, and a researcher calling for more female sex-specific combat-related equipment design and procurement.

To everyone that has participated in the ACVA study to date – we share with you Member of Parliament Rachel Blaney’s words “…thank you for being here to help us try to make the path safer for other veterans who are women and for other serving women members in the future.”

At the end of the day, is that not what we are all here to do – make it better for the next generation?

Highlights from ACVA – Part 7

 Anna-Lisa Rovak, Veteran

Photo Credit: Anna-Lisa Rovak

Esprit de Corps Magazine December 2023 // Volume 30 Issue 11

Let's Talk About Women in the Military –Column 57

By Military Woman

Question:

What happened at the October 24, 2023, meeting of the “Experience of Women Veterans” study?

Answer:

The Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs (ACVA) began this study’s fourteenth meeting with its first witness to date from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). In 1974, Beverley Ann Busson joined the first class of regular member RCMP women. In 2006, she became the RCMP’s first female commissioner. In 2018, she was named to the Senate.

True Patriot Love Foundation representative Eleanor Taylor also spoke. She shared with us her deep personal connection and pride in the fund named after her friend, Nichola Goddard. Since 2018, the Captain Nichola Goddard Fund has financially enabled many community programs that support servicewomen, women Veterans, and their families.

Despite the importance of both these testimonies – this meeting belonged to Anna-Lisa Rovak. Her testimony was riveting. Her opening statement was raw and direct; starting off with a poem she wrote on February 20, 2022, just after her second suicide attempt.

To Serve

Identity stripped to a bare soul

Twisted and pressed to fit a single mold

Told how to think and what to wear

Punished for any individuality

Mind and body pushed to the brink of insanity

Soul is empty of pride and self worth

Praised only when obedience is met

Rewarded when orders are fulfilled in silence

Tossed aside when worth is expended

Ignored, belittled by those who still serve

Unless the heart remains a slave

And traditions are followed with no thought

Today, I'm

Searching for identity

Searching for the original me

Searching for a new beginning

Trying to fill the void

Disappear or Reinvent

Sometimes they are the same

After such a heartbreakingly vulnerable testimony, the first Member of Parliament (MP) to speak to her was the Conservative Party of Canada’s Shadow Minister for Veterans Affairs – Blake Richards.  For reasons only known or understood by him and his political party, a party that self-identifies as honouring and respecting the nation’s military and all those that have served, MP Richards chose to prioritize matters unrelated to this study and committee over discussing

the testimony of the Veteran sitting directly in front of him.

Granted, the Shadow Minister for Veterans Affairs, was within his Parliamentary rights to do what he did. However, given the limited committee time available to develop recommendations to improve the health and wellbeing of Veterans, it was not the Veteran-centric thing to do.

When next given a chance to speak, Anna-Lisa’s response to this situation included the following:

“I do need to say one thing first, if I may, and it is that there was a prime example of exactly how women Veterans are dealt with daily, an hourly basis, in what we saw here earlier today. I got up from the table on purpose. I didn't get up because I hurt. I didn't get up because I was triggered. I got up because I was being ignored; I was being treated with disrespect; my story was not acknowledged, and someone was using me as their platform. That is part of the problem here.

I am not someone else's platform. I am not someone else's cash cow. I am not someone else's product. I am a human being; I am a veteran, and I am strong in that.”

She went on to describe many other personal challenges dealing with Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC). She noted that cumulatively, VAC had caused her more trauma than all her time in the military had, rapes included.

She challenged VAC to improve its trauma-aware and -informed support and care to Veterans through:

• Better handovers of care plans between case managers and contractors.

• Less requirement to retell past traumatic events to new VAC contact points.

• More trauma-aware treatment programs that don’t intermix or pre-assume co-existing addiction issues.

• More Veteran-VAC partnership in therapy and program decision making.

• More support for Veteran autonomy to do whatever is needed for them to feel safe, including leaving, when at VAC funded programs and services.

• More female-sex only programs like the “Women’s Program” offered at the Davidson Institute.

• More VAC employees with “the right attitude” to enable more Veterans access to “the right care options” for their healing journeys.

• Allowing Veterans their human dignity. Don’t force Veterans to “beggar.”

No Veteran, of any sex or gender, should ever feel a loss of their dignity, freedom, self-control, and sense of self as the price required to be paid in exchange for accessing the VAC benefits, programs, or services they need and are entitled to.

No Veteran should ever feel negated or that they are being used as a cash cow or product for someone else’s platform.

VAC (and some MPs) can, and must, do better.